LP_468x60
ontario news watch
on-the-record-468x60-white
and-another-thing-468x60

Premier Jason Kenney watches as Minister of Finance Travis Toews delivers the 2021 Alberta Provincial budget at the Alberta Legislature, in Edmonton Thursday Feb. 25, 2021.

In the Jason Kenney government last spring, as COVID-19 took hold, some people wanted to shut down the War Room.

The launch had ranged from clumsy to calamitous, the internal critics agreed.

They argued for disbanding the Canadian Energy Centre and later creating a less combative advocacy group for oil and gas.

But the War Room didn’t close. It merely went into hibernation, like Bigfoot.

The $30-million annual budget was temporarily cut by 90 per cent, ensuring less noise from that quarter.

But now the agency that’s built to fight for Alberta’s oil industry is back with a bang.

The

Bigfoot Battle against a cartoon and Netflix

has gained headlines in the U.S. and Britain, drawn widespread criticism, and lit up social media with derision and disbelief.

But it also prompts emotions like those in this typical email from a reader:

“The bully in the room, being Netflix, should be censured for using children’s programming to attack the oil and gas industry.

“Rachel Notley should be ashamed of herself for defending Netflix against the livelihood of Albertans.

“Good on Premier Kenney and the War Room for defending Alberta’s premier industry.”

Kenney himself launched a full-throated defence of the Bigfoot campaign. He said: “It’s clear that they (Netflix) developed content designed to defame in the most vicious way possible — in the impressionable minds of kids — the largest industry in the province.”

The Bigfoot Family battle is in Alaska, not Alberta, but we can’t expect rhetorical precision in a debate that starts with a cartoon.

 A screengrab from the Netflix website shows the animated movie called Bigfoot Family.

I asked Tom Olsen, CEO of the Canadian Energy Centre, if he informed the government, Kenney or Energy Minister Sonya Savage of the Bigfoot campaign before it began.

“Absolutely no, not at all,” he said. “They were not told.”

The suggestion for a campaign came from a staffer who saw the Bigfoot show, Olsen said.

Olsen was dubious at first because he knew there would be a negative uproar. But then he watched the video and decided to go ahead, he said, because he found it so slanderous toward the oil and gas industry and the people in it.

Government sources also say there’s no notice of War Room campaigns beforehand. They also add, with an eye-roll, that sometimes they wish there were.

You can believe this line or not, but one thing is clear, and I think the critics are missing it entirely.

The controversy fits Kenney’s current political needs perfectly.

First, NDP mockery of the campaign leaves Leader Rachel Notley open to charges of being anti-oil and gas. Kenney even calls her an enemy of the industry.

The record shows otherwise. Notley has made herself unpopular with national New Democrats by fighting for the industry and the Trans Mountain pipeline.

But when she tells Kenney “more people laughing at you is not a win,” she sounds like her biggest worry is outside opinion, not the feelings of oil and gas workers.

And right now, Kenney is engaged in his own

existential fight for the loyalty of conservatives

.

There’s deep discontent in some UCP riding associations. The party has decided to

hold a leadership review next year.

The premier is surely aware that every PC premier from Don Getty in 1992 to Alison Redford in 2014 was forced out not in a general election or even through a formal leadership review, but by internal party revolt.

Bedrock UCP conservatives are no less contentious. They may have doubts about Kenney, but right now very few of them will side with Bigfoot, Netflix or Notley.

And sneering from outside Alberta doesn’t change their minds — it just makes them angrier.

 Bigfoot Family

The Bigfoot saga is also a handy distraction from a wide array of irritants, including new job losses, the

big-spending budget

and continuing COVID-19 restrictions.

The chase for Bigfoot has led Kenney right back to his base and the promises he made to defend Alberta — the ones that got him elected.

He’s loving it. The NDP should beware, and maybe be silent.

Don Braid's column appears regularly in the Herald

dbraid@postmedia.com

Twitter:

@DonBraid

Facebook:

Don Braid Politics


Jason Nixon, Environment and Parks Minister

The Alberta government is launching consultations with municipalities and industry leaders to develop a program aimed at reducing plastic waste and recycling costs.

It plans to have a framework in place by the fall, including any necessary legislative changes.

The extended producer responsibility (EPR) program will “reduce volume in our landfills and diversify the economy,” according to the province. The approach will entail shifting the cost and management of recycling from municipalities and Alberta residents to companies that directly produce and consume those goods.

It will encourage companies to produce less waste and packaging by coming up with innovative ways to recycle more materials.

“This approach will help transition Alberta to a more circular economy by assuring that materials such as plastics are reused, recycled and remanufactured,” Environment and Parks Minister Jason Nixon said Wednesday morning at the Rural Municipalities of Alberta spring convention.

“As many of you have told me repeatedly, this is good for both the environment and the economy. It will also help meet market demand for recycled plastic that can be used to manufacture new products.”

Related

Nixon said the province needs “significant input” from municipal leaders as it develops its framework, which will also target printed paper and household hazardous waste.

Consultations will run until the end of April and will include sector-specific engagement sessions. It will also gather input from Albertans through

an online public survey

.

“We want to hear from municipalities, from industry, from experts in other communities on the best design for our approach,” Nixon said.

“While we all agree the EPR program is good for Alberta, there are numerous design elements that need practical advice from municipal leaders and others. Many jurisdictions have already made this shift and Alberta will learn from their experiences.”

Alberta’s recycling industry supports around 7,500 jobs and contributes about $132 million per year to the provincial economy.

The government anticipates its EPR program will increase that to more than $148 million, while helping to cut emissions by an estimated 72,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent annually, or the equivalent of taking 120,300 passenger cars off the road each year.

Calgary Coun. Peter Demong praised the provincial government’s announcement. In 2019, Demong

called on the province to implement an EPR regime

in a notice of motion that also asked for a study into current recycling practices, supply chains and potential effects of an EPR program.

“It’s good news for the environment, it’s good news for the economy, it’s good news for the ratepayers, taxpayers, good news for municipalities across Alberta,” Demong said.

“This is a win-win-win program.”

Alberta is one of the only provinces in Canada without an existing EPR program, the councillor said.

Last fall, federal Environment Minister Jonathan Wilkinson

announced a list of six single-use plastic items

that will be banned because they are both harmful to the environment and difficult to recycle.

Plastic straws, stir sticks, cutlery, six-pack rings, carry-out bags and Styrofoam plates and takeout containers won’t be allowed to be sold in Canada once the ban takes effect.

Industry groups

criticized the federal government's plan

to ban those items by labelling them “toxic,” calling it defamatory and harmful to the companies that produce them.

Nixon said Wednesday that Alberta will take a different direction than Ottawa.

“Our counterparts in Ottawa’s focus on this issue is on banning plastics from the market altogether,” he said.

“I would say that’s problematic for several different products, but particularly what we’ve seen during COVID-19 is we need plastics within a modern society. Our focus as a province continues to be — it will continue to be — on making it clear we have a waste problem, not a product problem.”

Demong estimated implementation of an EPR program would lead to “several hundred jobs” and return approximately $100 million to taxpayers annually.

“I’m not a big believer in banning products. If we can work to reinvent what those products should look like, it’s a better manoeuvre than simply trying to set out bans,” said Demong.

“It will increase the recycling rate, so it’s great for the environment. It will encourage the plastic manufacturers to do a better job of bringing the used plastic into the new product material again.”

shudes@postmedia.com

Twitter:

@SammyHudes


AER (Alberta Energy Regulator) flag.

The Alberta Energy Regulator has issued an order suspending all of Mojek Resources Inc.’s wells, facilities and pipelines after failure by the Calgary-based company to clean up multiple spills and comply with provincial regulations.

The order, issued Tuesday, stated that Mojek failed to demonstrate it could provide effective care and custody of its sites and that the company hadn’t complied with multiple past orders.

“The AER has directed the working interest participants and the Orphan Well Association (OWA) to provide care and custody over Mojek’s sites,” it stated.

Working interest participants refer to other parties that have a financial interest in a licensee’s wells and facilities. When directed by the AER, they have a duty to provide reasonable care and measures when the licensee they have partnered with has failed or is unable to do so, according to the order.

“We work with licensees to ensure they understand Alberta’s rules, and the majority of companies follow those rules,” said Blair Reilly, AER’s director of enforcement and emergency management.

“When they don’t, we take action to protect public safety and the environment.”

The order requires the OWA and Mojek’s working interest participants to take a number of actions, including the suspension of Mojek’s 32 wells, 35 pipelines and sole facility. They must ensure those assets “are left in a state that is safe to the public and environment.”

They must also address historical non-compliance at Mojek’s sites, provide an active emergency response number that will initiate an immediate response in an emergency, and provide a detailed plan that demonstrates how Mojek’s wells, facilities and pipelines will be cared for while they are suspended.

The AER previously suspended all of Mojek’s operations in January and ordered it to take action after repeated attempts seeking compliance by the company.

The regulator said Mojek remains in non-compliance with AER requirements. Tuesday’s order does not absolve Mojek from any of its responsibilities and liabilities, but ensures the sites are responsibly attended to for the protection of the public and environment, according to the regulator.

Mojek currently owes $1.76 million in security to the AER for its end-of-life obligations. The company also owes outstanding debts to the OWA and the AER.

Energy Minister Sonya Savage said the Alberta government plans to implement a new liability management framework that will include steps for “tougher enforcement” when oil and gas companies don’t meet their regulatory requirements.

“The vast majority of our oil and gas sector are complying with their regulatory obligations,” Savage said.

“Ones that aren’t, there does need to be enforcement.”

The new framework will allow the AER to work with companies in financial distress on meeting their obligations, she added.

“I think it’ll bring them to the table,” said Savage.

“It’s a small group that aren’t (complying), but there are resources that are available in the AER to work with those companies, to help them find pathways to meet regulatory compliance. I think it will encourage companies to take those steps.”

— With files from Chris Varcoe

shudes@postmedia.com

Twitter:

@SammyHudes


This content is restricted to subscribers

The views, opinions and positions expressed by columnists and contributors are the author’s alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of our publication.


The flowers are blooming, the birds are chirping, the vaccinations are finally happening.

What better time to have an election?

Because, make no mistake: Justin Trudeau feels he has unfinished business to attend to. He "won" in 2019, sure, but he really didn't. He knows that.

Andrew Scheer's Conservatives got more votes than he did.  He lost his Parliamentary majority.  He lost his coveted international celebrity status first with his obstruction of justice in the SNC-Lavalin scandal, and then with being caught wearing racist blackface no less than three times.

And he formed a government, barely, with the smallest share of the popular vote in Canadian history.

So how did he survive, against a better-funded, better-organized Conservative Party?  Two reasons.

One, it's the O.J. Simpson Principle.  Celebrities like Justin Trudeau are held to a different standard than us mere mortals.  They breathe a more rarefied air.  So, he got away with things LavScam and blackface, most notably that no other politician would.

Two, he had expanded his base.  After he won the leadership of the Liberal Party of Canada in 2013, he set about radically transforming it.  He moved left further left than any other Liberal leader had and essentially took over the New Democratic Party.

It wasn't a hostile takeover, either.  After the death of Jack Layton who would have never, ever let it happen the NDP effectively became an extension of the Trudeau Liberal Party.  It has remained that ever since.  It's a proxy party.

Conservatives not the senior and experienced ones, but the rank-and-file commenced making mistakes.  They underestimated Trudeau, over and over.  Having worked for many years for Jean Chretien, I have learned how useful it is for your opponent to underestimate you at election time.

The Conservative grassroots attacked Trudeau for being not manly enough even though he wiped out their champion in a celebrated boxing match.  They attacked him for having been enthusiastic about drama even though one of their heroes, Ronald Reagan, had done likewise.

And the Conservative core consistently and wrongly assumed that Canadians hated Justin Trudeau as much as they did.  And, when they were taught hard lessons on election night in 2015 and 2019, they'd lash out at other Canadians, the ones who didn't hate Trudeau like they did.

They'd call them puerile names Libtard and Lieberal and the like.  They'd even say they were going to put Trudeau in an outhouse.  Not exactly a winning strategy.

The Oil Patch won't defeat Trudeau.  Neither will the myriad third party advocacy groups.  Nor will the conservative media.  None have the resources or the bandwidth to do so.  Only the Conservative Party, and its leadership, can beat him.  How?

To defeat an enemy, learn from your enemy.  To win an election, learn from your mistakes.  To beat Trudeau and I increasingly believe Erin O'Toole simply won't, and that he may well secure fewer seats than Andrew Scheer did you need to pay attention to what Trudeau did.

He abandoned traditional media and embraced social media, because that is where most Canadian voters are to be found.  He united the left in the way that Stephen Harper and Peter MacKay united the right.  He didn't, and doesn't, pay any attention to negative coverage and he gets his fair share, too.  He stays above the fray, and he stays on message.

Most of all, he isn't like Paul Martin he doesn't need to be loved by everyone.  He focuses, laser-like, on only the voters and regions that he needs to win.  And then he wins.

Justin Trudeau should not be underestimated.  But he can be beaten.

To do that, the Conservative Party needs to learn from him, and not merely loathe him.

Kinsella was Special Assistant to the Rt. Hon. Jean Chretien.

Photo Credit: Jeff Burney, Loonie Politics

The views, opinions and positions expressed by columnists and contributors are the author’s alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of our publication.