LP_468x60
on-the-record-468x60-white

Jason Kenney should finish mourning and move along.  The more fuss he makes about the inevitable death of the Keystone pipeline only highlights his shocking waste of public funds on a long-shot bet.

For politicians on both sides of the border Keystone represented far more than a pipeline.  President Joe Biden has conflated the slaying of this particular pipeline with his climate action stand.  Jason Kenney bet billions of provincial taxpayer dollars on the pipe which would represent an economic rebound for Alberta's energy sector.

Keystone really doesn't fit the lofty goal of either of those goals.  One pipeline won't appreciably reduce the U.S.'s enormous carbon footprint.  One pipeline won't stop the continuing decline of fossil fuel.

Biden promised U.S. voters last spring he would kill Keystone if elected.  Yet Kenney went ahead and bought a chunk of the pipeline for $1.5 billion in tax dollars, with a promise of a further $6 billion in loan guarantees.

Observers at the time were stumped on the logic of the Alberta investment.

Why would a premier who loves to chant "promise made, promise kept" with every campaign vow he fulfills think the president of the United States would not follow up on a key platform policy?

Was he that convinced Donald Trump would win the election?

His hyperbolic reaction to Biden's blocking of Keystone is bizarrely over-emotional.

"Look, we didn't start this dispute," Kenney told Global News.  "It was the president, who on day one, decided to show disrespect for America's closest friend and ally."

And of course Kenney decided to pull his perennial foe Justin Trudeau into his mock fight, arguing Canada must at least ask for compensation and, failing that, start a trade war with the U.S.

It's as though in the absence of Trump, Kenney feels he has to fill some North American  political hot air quota.

An Angus Reid poll released this week shows that, for 72 per cent of Albertans, the Keystone pipeline fight isn't over and Canada should be striving to get a reversal of Biden's decision.  More than half of Canadians outside of the Prairies however said: 'let it go, already'.

The pollsters were in the field for a couple of days immediately after the U.S. inauguration day.  So yes, even though the hope for Keystone to survive was always faint, there was still a palpable disappointment in Alberta that Biden wouldn't relent.

Now Kenney should take the lead, move past that let down and drop his ludicrous call for a trade war.  His impotent fist shaking at the U.S. president is an embarrassment.

Alberta's economy is hanging by a thread and now is the time for some indication of whether the UCP is the right party to haul it out of the abyss.

Kenney needs to get over his personal stake in this fight.  Yes, it is probably galling that his bet on a pipeline has ended in disaster while his federal rival Trudeau's TransMountain pipeline is forging onward.

At some point Kenney will also have to make a full accounting of how much the Keystone bet actually cost taxpayers.  The government blocked NDP attempts in a legislature committee this week to reveal what kind of financial and risk advice it received before making the pipeline investment.

The final tab, likely to be at least $1 billion, should be revealed in provincial budget figures this spring.

Certainly past provincial governments have spent plenty on private sector boondoggles over the decades.  But much of that money was spent in the interest of diversification of the economy.  The shoring up of a pipeline project never fit that bill.

Even if there had been any chance of Keystone proceeding, there still would be valid questions of whether, in a time of fiscal constraint, the government is wise to plow this much money into the energy sector.

That billion dollar bet could have been put to better use building on other potential strengths in the Alberta economy, like the health tech or artificial intelligence sectors.  Kenney needs to redirect all that energy he's putting into blustering against the U.S president into forging a viable future for his province.

Photo Credit: CBC News

The views, opinions and positions expressed by columnists and contributors are the author’s alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of our publication.


Beep beep.

Not so fun now that Donald is gone now, is it, Justin?

Donald Trump, you see, was Justin Trudeau's secret Saturday morning cartoon weapon.  Whenever the Liberal prime Minister got into a bit of trouble, he could always count on the Republican president to get into even more trouble.

With Donald playing the role of Wile E. Coyote, Justin always looked like the Roadrunner.  Couldn't fail.  Beep beep.

So, Trudeau accepted gifts from the Aga Khan lobbyists, sure, and was found to be in a conflict of interest.  Trump topped that: he used the Trump Foundation, a charity, to engage in what the New York Attorney General called "a shocking pattern of illegality."

And, yes, Trudeau obstructed justice in the SNC-Lavalin scandal, and was cited for his wrongdoing by the Ethics Commissioner.  Trump outdid him: he tried to get a foreign government to go after a political rival, one Joseph R. Biden, and was impeached.

And, of course, Trudeau was caught wearing racist blackface three (3) times, and was thereafter reduced to a minority government by unimpressed Canadians.  But Trump beat that, too: he called some neo-Nazis "fine people" and told the white supremacist Proud Boys to "stand by" and was again impeached for encouraging the selfsame Proud Boys, et al., to storm Capitol Hill.

Beep beep.

But here's the thing: the hapless, hopeless cartoon that was Donald Trump has been cancelled.  And now Justin Trudeau doesn't look so speedy and smart anymore.

Even worse: in a single week, the Mango Mussolini's replacement at the White House, the aforementioned Joe Biden, is managing to make Justin Trudeau look neither speedy nor smart.

This week, Trudeau voted to condemn white supremacy and (perhaps, maybe, probably) designate the Proud Boys a terrorist group.  Trudeau did this to get us all to forget, perhaps, that organized hate activity has exploded in Canada during his tenure with hate crimes up some 60 per cent on his watch.

Biden, in contrast, signed a raft of executive orders in just his first week on the job.  He ordered an end to workplace discrimination based on sexual orientation.  He ended the Muslim travel ban.  He told federal agencies to take concrete steps to combat anti-Asian bigotry that has surged during the pandemic.  And he ordered a massive government-wide audit to bolster racial justice reform.

Last week, meanwhile, Trudeau was revealed to have botched l'affaire Payette selecting Julie Payette for governor-general without properly vetting her, and blaming others when caught out.  Biden, on the other hand, appointed a team of experienced, capable folks to make up his cabinet.  And even Trumpian figures like Lindsey Graham and Marco Rubio are saying it's important to get them prompt Senate approval.

And, then, of course, there is the matter of vaccines.

To date, less than two per cent of Canadians have been vaccinated.  This week, we completely ran out of the Pfizer vaccine and the Trudeau Liberals are very vague when we can expect to get all of what we paid for.

Despite Trudeau's claims that all of us will get the potentially life-saving jab by the Fall, The Economist this week flatly stated that Canadians will actually be waiting even longer until mid-2022, more than a year away.

In Joe Biden's America, meanwhile, nearly 50 million vaccine doses have been distributed.  More than 20 million Americans have received the vaccine.  And the newly-minted U.S. President this week announced he's purchasing 100 million additional doses and expects to have every American vaccinated by Summer.

On every front, in every way, Joe Biden is making Justin Trudeau look really, really ineffective.  But for Trudeau, not all the news is bad.

You can now audition for the role of Wile E. Coyote, Justin.  It's you.

Beep beep.

[Kinsella was Chief of Staff to a federal Liberal Minister of Health.]

Photo Credit: BNN Bloomberg

The views, opinions and positions expressed by columnists and contributors are the author’s alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of our publication.


I've been thinking a lot about my grandmother lately, perhaps because it was a year and a few weeks ago since she died.

She died quite naturally, nothing to do with living in a for-profit retirement home, though she did live in one.  That the end of her life came before the pandemic is, almost certainly, a blessing.  One morning she woke up, went to the washroom to put her teeth in and the aneurism that had been growing for some years in her aorta let go, just a couple months out from her 95th birthday.  She never did get her teeth in.  We should all be so lucky to meet our end so swiftly.

But before she'd died, she'd had to move from her lovely little apartment on the top floor, down to a nursing floor, with a stop on the memory care floor — where people with dementia, Alzheimer's and other similar illnesses lived — while waiting for a general nursing bed.  She'd had to be moved to a higher level of care after beating pneumonia — at 94! — but all the same slowing down just a little more.

It was during these stays on the care floors that I began to question the whole system of retirement homes.  They weren't bad, by any stretch of things.  There was no abuse.  Everyone was given attention and cared for, but it always felt a bit lacking.  I was always left with the thought, "This is it?  This is the best this place offers?'  The home was not a cheap one, and while nothing approached neglect, it never felt entirely adequate.

The shabby floors on the memory care floor said something, how it compared unfavourably to the rest of the building.  When people were at their most vulnerable, when there was nowhere else to go, they were kept in the worst conditions in the home.  The more independent you were, the better the options.

Worst of all was the knowledge, or at least the assumption, that however lacking the place seemed, it was going to be miles better than other homes.

This is all a long wind up to saying that profit has no place in our long-term care system.

From the start of the pandemic the broken parts in our society, the things that have always been there, have been exposed in brutal and horrifying ways.  No more has that been more clear, brutal, and horrifying than in long-term care.

In Ontario, nearly 6,000 people have died of COVID, more than two-thirds of those people — 4,100 or so — have died in long term care.  And of the people who have died in long-term care, the vast majority, 69 percent, have died in for-profit LTCs.  Most of the province's LTCs are privately owned, for-profit operations, but even though they only account for 57 percent of the LTCs in the province, they still account for 69 percent of the deaths.  Only eight percent of deaths have happened in public homes, which make up 16 percent of the total homes.

(The numbers for deaths in types of homes comes courtesy of the incredible work freelance journalist Nora Loreto is doing compiling it all, with an assist from the visualization of Andrew Lam.  The Canadian Institute for Health Information is the source of the ownership percentage numbers.  I've kept the numbers round as they'll have changed slightly between when I'm writing this and when this is published.)

Okay, you may be saying, have you any other examples?  Why yes, I just so happen to right here.

Quebec has a much different mix of private and public homes. In this province, 86 percent of the homes are publicly run. It's a province that has been hammered by COVID, where deaths in long-term care make up just shy of 40 percent of the country's whole death toll, at about 7,500. It's horrific. Even still, for-profit private homes still make up a full one-quarter (25 percent) of the LTC deaths in the province, despite making up less than 14 percent of the total homes. Deaths in publicly owned homes make up only 45 percent of the total.  For-profit homes in the province don't even make up the full slice of privately owned homes in the province — CIHI doesn't have information on how many private LTCs in Quebec are for-profit, and how many are not-for-profit — and yet they still make up more than the share of private vs. public LTCs.

The numbers in the other provinces are harder to draw too many conclusions from, given how many fewer people have died in LTC outside of Ontario and Quebec.  As well the percentage of LTC deaths where the type of home is unknown is many times higher in provinces outside those provinces where a significant number of people have died in LTC.

But where there is an obvious trend, the implication is a clear one: where homes are run to make a profit, more people are dying.

And there's no reason that this trend will reverse.  The outbreak in Barrie, Ont. currently ravaging a home there is largely being blamed on the new strain of COVID going around, but what may actually be in play is neglectful policies that ignored COVID best practices and instead did things like put people who were negative for the virus in the same room as people who were positive.  Would you believe the Roberta Place LTC is privately run for profit?  Of course it is.

An excellent feature in the Toronto Star makes clear many things, and is worth your time, but the bottom line is this: over decades the evidence is clear, for-profit homes have worse health outcomes for residents, pandemic or no pandemic.

My grandmother was lucky, in the sense she didn't have to live through this pandemic.  If she had lived, and her aneurism had not burst, and the loneliness of lockdown had not had her fade out of life, what would have happened?  I don't know.  But three people at her former home died after a COVID outbreak there.  What are the odds a 95-year-old who had beaten pneumonia would have been able to beat COVID, too?

Now is the time to ask ourselves why it is people are making money off the care of society's most vulnerable.  They aren't doing the job well, more people are suffering and dying because of the for-profit model.  We should not allow it any longer.  Profit has no place in the care of people.

Photo Credit:  CBC News

The views, opinions and positions expressed by columnists and contributors are the author’s alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of our publication.