LP_468x60
ontario news watch
on-the-record-468x60-white
and-another-thing-468x60

As the pandemic continues to grow at an alarming rate across the country, we are watching several premiers simply abdicate their constitutional obligations to do something meaningful about it.  Most of them Doug Ford, Jason Kenney, François Legault, Brian Pallister, and even John Horgan, have been more concerned about ensuring that restaurants and bars remain open and operating rather than taking the necessary steps to prevent the spread of the infection, apparently oblivious to the fact that if people aren't healthy, the economy suffers whether these businesses stay open or not.  And as the cases and deaths continue to climb, are the premiers being held to account?  Rest assured they are not, but everyone is turning to prime minister Justin Trudeau, whose jurisdiction this problem is not.

The focus on the federal government is as deeply curious as it is frustrating, because anyone who has spent any amount of time in this country should know by now that we have a strongly decentralized federation, and that healthcare delivery is the exclusive jurisdiction of the provinces (barring provision to First Nations and military personnel, much of which is still delivered by provinces by merely reimbursed by the federal government).  Provincial premiers constantly berate attempts by the federal government to "meddle" in healthcare, even though "meddling" tends to mean ensuring that provinces don't do things like charge for private delivery of services, or trying to fund greater access to certain priority areas like mental health or home care.

I can immediately hear the protests of "But surely they play a role!" and the invocation of the Canada Health Act like it's some kind of a talisman.  Few enough people and reporters especially seem to grasp that the federal role around healthcare is funding for the primary purpose of ensuring that there are equitable levels of care available across the country.  This is why enforcement to ensure that provinces aren't charging things like user fees or setting up alternative private for-profit delivery matters it keeps it equitable and accessible for all users.  There are still plenty of gaps, and places where provinces are not fulfilling their obligations, but for the most part, this is the overriding goal of federal involvement.  In addition, the Canada Health Act was the conclusion of federal-provincial negotiations, and not a starting point or something imposed top-down on the provinces, which is why demands to start unilaterally including things into the Act are non-starters (and why the federal government can't just draft a similar bill for pharmacare without provincial buy-in, like the NDP keep proposing).

What has become deeply frustrating over the course of the past nine or so months as the pandemic has essentially taken over the functioning of the country is that there is his erroneous belief, constantly perpetuated and reinforced by reporters, that somehow because of the Canada Health Act, that the federal government is some sort of parental jurisdictional figure, and that it can sweep in and start acting in provinces where their provincial governments are not doing enough to deal with the pandemic.  This is not the case.  Under our constitution, there is a division of powers powers are not delegated to the province by the federal government and cannot be taken back.  Instead, powers are divided between the provincial and federal governments based on spheres of responsibility, and it takes a constitutional amendment to change which order of government that particular area of jurisdiction falls under.

The federal government is not some parental figure, and it is not going to take over the responsibility of healthcare delivery in this country.  Yes, there is the theoretical ability to do so under the Emergencies Act, but that cannot be invoked without the consent of the provinces, and that has not happened, and you can be assured that it will not happen.  And yet, this is now the expectation that many members of the media keep circling around that eventually, Trudeau is going to unilaterally invoke the Act and take charge, and more to the point, these same reporters are trying to set up the expectation that if Trudeau doesn't do this, that he will be accountable for the infections and deaths across the country as some kind of refusal to act.  This is not only wrong, but it's completely wrong-headed.

Because there is a constitutional division of powers and not a delegation, provinces have tremendous amounts of power in their own areas of jurisdiction, and most are simply choosing not to act not only with regard to stricter public health protocols or lockdowns, but more fundamentally when it comes to things like supporting those small businesses, or commercial or residential rent supports, all of which have been important issues that they have refused to address (to the point where the federal government has been forced to twice now kludge together some kind of rent assistance program when they have a very limited number of levers available to them).  The federal government has been going above and beyond to support provinces, and turning over vast sums of money to them to keep the country going in the face of this pandemic and not complaining about it either but because they simply use the language of "working together with provinces and territories" rather than "you should talk to your premier," it keeps sending the wrong impression about just how much clout they actually have.

It's time to start really holding the premiers to account for their ballsing up the response to this pandemic because they are too afraid of their own bottom lines and balanced budget promises.  The federal government isn't going to save you it's not their job.  It's your premier's job to do the heavy lifting on testing, tracing, isolation, public health measures, supporting businesses affected by those measures, and yes, rent supports for people affected by this pandemic, and the longer you keep looking to Trudeau to do that work, the more these premiers will keep skating by, and nothing will get fixed.  Put the pressure where the responsibility lies.

Photo Credit: CBC News

The views, opinions and positions expressed by columnists and contributors are the author’s alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of our publication.


Not so many months ago Alberta was low in the provincial rankings of Covid infections, praised for the number of tests it could complete in a day and lauded for its prescient stockpiling of PPE.

It appeared the Alberta government was on the right track.  It never completely locked down the economy, leaving construction sites buzzing and keeping a number of workplaces open without huge repercussions.

The picture is radically different now.

Alberta is punching well above its weight in terms of new Covid cases.  On Tuesday there were 713 new cases reported, seven deaths in 24 hours, 8,090 active cases in the province. Most troubling is the rapid filling up of hospital beds 207 Covid cases in hospital with 43 of those in ICU.

A continuing care home outbreak in Edmonton precipitated by one case in the third week October has claimed the lives of 10, with 76 patients and 70 staff infected. Still Alberta Premier Jason Kenney and Medical Officer of Health Deena Hinshaw talk about the need to balance mental and economic health against the perils of the spreading pandemic. But now strategies that appeared to be working in spring and summer are failing.  Appealing to individual responsibility, Kenney's mantra of late, is having little or no effect. Just check Alberta social media if you still believe our better angels will save the day.  Twitter is devolving into a free-for-all of libertarian anti-maskers reviving the long since debunked theory that Covid is no worse than seasonal flu.

Kenney's thought processes on Covid strategy are pretty explicit.  He stated them on Friday. "We've seen other jurisdictions implement sweeping lockdowns, indiscriminately violating people's rights and destroying livelihoods.  Nobody wants that to happen here in Alberta." While that might fit well into his big picture balance-the-risk philosophy, the statement was pretty tone deaf given the current crisis.

Even Justin Trudeau felt the need to counter any economy-trumps-all sentiment. "I would hope that no leader in our country is easing public health vigilance because they feel pressure not to shut down businesses or slow down our economy," the prime minister said this week.

To be fair, Kenney's tactics aren't just about the economy.  In a province with a continuing job crisis and a relatively young population, mental and social well being must weigh on the public health balance.

However, it's time for some triage to wrestle the immediate crisis.  The circuit breaker strategy, a  short defined lockdown to knock back Covid spread, won't bring the pandemic to a halt but it will address the specific mounting emergency in Alberta's hospitals and care homes. The target is to provide some breathing room for health care workers to regroup. Besides the strains in hospital occupancy and staffing, Alberta is faced with a shortage of contact tracers.  The province is now only doing very limited contact calls while it scrambles to staff up call centres.

In the interim, Albertans with positive Covid test results are expected to call their own contacts a spotty and wishful-thinking strategy.

Ironically Kenney's refusal to adopt the national Covid Alert app in Alberta is particularly ill-thought out now.  The premier argued that since Covid Alert doesn't connect back to provincial contact tracers it isn't as effective as the province's Trace Alberta app.  That's sort of a moot point now.

The wheels have fallen off Alberta's Covid strategy.

It may be galling for the premier to follow the lead of his peers across the country and re-institute lockdowns but it's time to take action.  A short sharp lockdown will let the province take a deep breath before plunging back into the lengthy efforts to bend the Covid curve while trying to revive the economy.

Alberta's initial measured approach worked well for the province in early days.  But in any long campaign, battle plans must be occasionally reviewed and revamped to address changing circumstances.

Photo Credit: Edmonton Journal

The views, opinions and positions expressed by columnists and contributors are the author’s alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of our publication.


Justin Trudeau is a three.

The late, great Rafe Mair left us with one of the truest of truisms: in politics, if you are a three, it doesn't matter if everyone nearby is a two.

Never has Mair's observation been more true than with Justin Trudeau.  The Liberal leader may be a dwarf, politically, but he still dwarfs all the dwarfs around him.  (True.)

Such was the case with one Donald Trump, soon to be a private citizen.  Trump was the best thing that ever happened to Justin Trudeau.

Trudeau had no shortage of wounds, all of them self-inflicted.  And in each and every case, however bad Trudeau looked, Trump could always be counted upon to look far worse.

Take Trudeau's commitment to ethics (please).  Trudeau is the first sitting Prime Minister to have been found to have violated ethics rules multiple times.

Remember the Aga Khan scandal?  In that one, Trudeau took gifts from a lobbyist free flights, traveling to a private island, and then saying nothing was wrong when he got caught.

Well, it was wrong.  Plenty wrong.  So said the ethics commissioner, who found Trudeau had flagrantly  violated conflict of interest laws.

Same with the SNC Lavalin scandal, otherwise known as Lavscam.  In that one, Trudeau and his officials including his Minister of finance, who hastily-departed in the middle of yet another ethics imbroglio tried to bully his Minister of Justice into giving a sweetheart deal to a Quebec-based Liberal Party donor facing prosecution for corruption.

Because she refused to go along with the scheme, Trudeau drove out his female and Indigenous Minister of Justice.  He was again cited for wrongdoing by the ethics counsellor.

But, even after all that, Trump made Trudeau look like a rank amateur.  Trump actually attempted to get a foreign power to investigate a detested political rival who was also an American citizen one Joe Biden, Democrat thereby earning himself a full congressional investigation and a later impeachment.

Another example: racism.  In the middle of last year's federal election, Justin Trudeau was found to have worn racist blackface no less than three (3) times.  He even admitted that he may have done it more times than that.

It was inarguably racist, and it made Canada an international laughingstock.

Well, Donald Trump outdid even that.  After the terrible events in Charlottesville where an innocent woman was actually killed by a white supremacist Trump said that there were "fine people" to be found among the ranks of the neo-Nazis and white supremacists.

That's not all: in the middle of his first debate with Joe Biden, Trump declined to condemn white supremacy and groups like the racist Proud Boys.

During the coronavirus pandemic, which has been the defining political event of our collective lifetimes, Justin Trudeau again found a way to unimpress.

At the start of the pandemic, his government actively discouraged the wearing of masks, sniffed that the risk to Canadians was "low," and actually called those who wanted to shut the border to China racist.

In retrospect, not impressive.  But once again, Donald Trump was determined to impress even less. He said the virus would go away in the Spring (it didn't).

He said it was a hoax (it wasn't).  He said people should consider injecting themselves with bleach (they shouldn't).

And so on and so on.  Justin Trudeau is a three.  But Donald Trump was always, always a two.

Heads up, Justin: Joe Biden may not be perfect, but he's no two.

And compared to you, big guy, he's pretty close to a 10.

The views, opinions and positions expressed by columnists and contributors are the author’s alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of our publication.


Hands up if you're worried about the American election.  My goodness.  What a sea of arms and such interesting hand positions.  But maybe everyone can unclench their fists and stop pointing fingers for a minute.  What harm could it do?  Unlike continuing to howl with rage or scorn.

In through the nose, out through the mouth.  Repeat until calm enough to note that every four years the United States has a raucous presidential election.  But once the voting is done the ballots are counted and, once people are confident in the count, the result is certified and we move on.  Which you'd think would be uncontroversial… if you lived under a thick and distant rock.  Instead it seems that everyone has gone mad.

I seem to be in a rather unusual position here in that I loathe Donald Trump without loving Joe Biden.  I don't like many of Trump's policies because I'm a small-government, traditional social values conservative.  But I do like many of them because I'm also a hawk and especially on foreign policy, despite his fondness for dictators and chronic aversion to systematic informed thought, he seems to have much better instincts than any of his predecessors since Reagan.

If you're a Trump-lover, hold off throwing anything including obscenities until I give you good cause by repeating that I loathe his character and politics.  And if you're a Trump-hater, hold off until, in addition to calling Biden shallow, nasty and possibly senile, I repeat that you seem to have turned into mirror images of Trump.

See, what really worries me at this point is that most Trump partisans I hear from are utterly convinced a priori of massive voter fraud.  Trump lost, therefore we wuz robbed, QED.  And most Trump-haters I hear from are equally and a priori convinced there cannot have been any fraud at all.  Trump lost, therefore the election puts Mary to shame when it comes to immaculacy of conception, QED.

I say again, have you all gone mad?  How do any of you know?  The raucousness of American democracy includes party machines creatively and shamelessly jamming the boxes one way or another from the beginning.  Google Lyndon Johnson and Box 13, for instance.  Or the 1876 presidential election.  But it has rarely been decisive.  Why would this year be different on either count?

The United States is a self-governing republic not a shady or sinister tyranny.  But the whole 2020 mess with post-dated and provisional ballots and campaigns going door-to-door "assisting" people in filling out mail-ins, plus late votes and lopsided "drops" and strange vote-counting halts and so forth opened a door to jiggery-pokery and if you don't think anyone danced through it you are a chump or worse.  You have hated Trump so much he entered your soul.

On the other hand, I have immediately and repeatedly not retweeted umpteen rumours of fraud. While I've heard of inexplicable swings or implausible turnout in some counties, out-of-state cars arriving with boxes of ballots, Dominion voting machines switching votes systematically from red to blue etc., I have no idea if they're true and, even more importantly, if they were decisive in any state.  But they could have been.

I am not being paranoid.  My hat has been lined with tinfoil since graduate school.  But while I do not believe in conspiracies I certainly believe in error, dishonesty and zealotry and if you say you don't, or that only your enemies are prone to them, you are lying, insane or both.

So my Plan B: Instead of sneering or raving, check it out with whatever rationality and charity we can still muster.  If you ask me to believe Trump was swindled, I demand real evidence.  If you ask me to believe he could not have been, I ask what drug you took and of course it's the blue pill.

Meanwhile, can everyone agree that the outcome is very close and it's premature to have media outlets braying that Biden has been "declared the winner" when they did the declaring?  The United States' clear legal and constitutional mechanisms for doing so have not yet been triggered for perfectly ordinary reasons, namely the counting and recounting is not done.  I also wish the press could drop the "president-elect" thing until he really is.  (And yes, that a vaccine had not appeared right after the election, a development perfectly calculated to fuel paranoia.)

I also wish the press could stop braying that Trump must concede and that court challenges undermine democracy.  Indeed, after George W. Bush phoned Biden and congratulated him like the gentleman it turns out he was all along, I found myself wondering how long it took Clinton or Carter to phone Bush and congratulate him in 2000?

As it turns out, even Gore did not concede until December 13 of that year, giving Trump another month.  And Gore and many others insisted then and later that that election was stolen, so no gluing on a cardboard halo now.

If that account seems one-sided, I also wish the Trumpistas would drop the paranoia.  But I think the Democrats and their liberal fellow-travellers have the most to gain by insisting on prompt and thorough investigation of any credible claims of irregularities instead of trying to hoot them off the stage in Trumpian fashion, precisely because Biden probably did win.

Even if his narrowing lead in Arizona vanishes, and in Georgia, it's hard to imagine jiggery-pokery in either Pennsylvania or Michigan being on a sufficient scale to overturn the outcome.  Hard.  But not impossible.

So again, unclench the fists and listen to me, please, about one more terrifying possibility.  What if Biden is certified and inaugurated and then next spring some real investigative reporter finds conclusive evidence of ballot-box-stuffing in, say, Philadelphia or Pittsburgh, on a scale sufficient to tip the Keystone state?  Can you imagine the harm to the body politic?

If Biden won, his backers have nothing to lose and much to gain, including in healing the nation, by saying hey, we know funny things happen in elections, and we're not afraid to check them out and punish anyone who cheated.  Bring us any evidence you have.  And if he actually lost, curiously, they again have much to gain by discovering it now.  Instead they've become funhouse mirror images of Trump.

What a legacy for him… and for them.

The views, opinions and positions expressed by columnists and contributors are the author’s alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of our publication.