LP_468x60
ontario news watch
on-the-record-468x60-white
and-another-thing-468x60

The coronavirus pandemic is one of the biggest events of our collective lifetimes.  You don't have to take a poll.  It just is.

Millions of Canadians without work.  Companies going bankrupt.  Families in crisis.  And, of course, 110,000 of us infected with Covid-19, and more than 9,000 dead.

It has been a cataclysm.  It has been a disaster on an unprecedented scale.  It has been, per Yeats, things falling apart, and a center that cannot hold.  Anarchy, loosed upon our world.

Compared to the Americans our national pastime we Canadians are doing better, a lot better.  They have nearly four million people infected.  They have more than 140,000 dead many, if not most, due to the delusional psychosis that has seized the death cult that is the Republican Party.  Led, as it is, by a monkey with a machine-gun.

So, we Canadians compare ourselves to the United States, which is now more a charnel-house than a country.  We feel better about ourselves, pat ourselves on our backs, and then go about the tightrope-walking that is life during a lethal pandemic.

But we shouldn't.  We shouldn't get too cocky.  Because there are other measurements to be applied to our leaders.  Not just comparisons of body counts.

Corruption, for instance.

Justin Trudeau has been called corrupt many times in the past.  When, for example, he secretly accepted gifts from a lobbyist traveling on the lobbyist's helicopter to the lobbyist's private island.  When he was caught, the Liberal leader shrugged. "We," he said, actually using that pronoun to describe  himself, "don't see an issue."

The Ethics Commissioner sure did.  She ruled that Trudeau has broken conflict of interest rules four times by succumbing to the Aga Khan's influence-peddling.

That was followed by the LavScam scandal, wherein Trudeau, his Finance Minister and their underlings pressured the Minister of Justice on 22 separate occasions to give a sweetheart deal to a corrupt corporate donor to Trudeau's party.  When the Globe and Mail reported what he had done,Trudeau angrily denied it all.

But the Ethics Commissioner again found Trudeau guilty.  The Liberal leader had "flagrantly" violated conflict of interest laws, said the Commissioner, by attempting to stop a prosecution of the Quebec-based SNC Lavalin.  Said he: "The evidence showed there were many ways in which Mr. Trudeau, either directly or through the actions of those under his direction, sought to influence the attorney general."

In both cases, Justin Trudeau solemnly assured Canadians that he'd learned he lesson.  He promised to avoid all conflicts of interest, real or perceived. Canadians believed him, and re-elected him in 2019.

And now, he is at it again.  This time, it isn't just his Finance Minister and senior staff implicated, either.  This time, his wife, his mother and his brother are alleged to have received hundreds of thousands of dollars from the serpentine WE organization.  His Finance Minister's children, meanwhile, received jobs from WE.

While seamy and sordid, none of that is necessarily fatal.  What makes it lethal, politically, is the Prime Minister and his Finance Minister voting, one, to hand WE a billion-dollar contract without competition.

Two, to do so without disclosing their conflict of interest to cabinet.

Three, to do so without acknowledging that their families had been the recipients of WE's largesse.

And, four, to do all that in the middle of a pandemic, when Canada is facing a $343 billion deficit due to the coronavirus pandemic.

It's that last one that makes WE-gate much worse than LavScam or the Aga Khan scandal: rich people the Trudeaus, the Morneaus and the cultists behind the WE "charity" seen to be getting richer during a pandemic.  When everyone else is getting measurably poorer.

When Canadians are losing their jobs, losing their homes, Margaret Trudeau is getting a quarter of a million dollars to give some speeches.  That, to many of us, is despicable.

Still, some Liberal partisans shrug.  During a pandemic, do such things matter?  In the big scheme of things, does the $352,000 the Trudeaus received even compare to the billions Canadians have received from their federal government to help them through an unprecedented crisis?

It matters.

When this writer had the honour and privilege of working for Jean Chrétien, we'd frequently hear stories about wealthy interests offering our boss a room at their mansions while he was touring the country.  No charge.  Just stay for the night, they'd tell him.  In mist cases, they were just being hospitable.

But Chrétien would always say no.  Back at the office, he'd tell us why: "Those little things add up.  They create the wrong impression.  So I stayed at a motel."

And therein lies the moral of the tale, the one that Justin Trudeau has not learned and never will: big political graves are dug with tiny shovels.

With the WE scandal, Justin Trudeau is again digging his.

Photo Credit: CBC News

The views, opinions and positions expressed by columnists and contributors are the author’s alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of our publication.


Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's damage control plan to extricate himself from the "WE Charity" scandal is basically to remind the Canadian public that he's a nice guy.

Indeed, his recent apology for the scandal could be paraphrased thusly, "I am so sorry I tried to hand over nearly $ 1 billion to an organization, which seemingly only exists to pay out huge speaking fees to my relatives, but since I'm such a nice person, I thought it'd be nice to aid a nice charity that so nicely helps my nice family members, so in a sense it was my inherent sense of niceness which blinded me to any conflict of interest."

Hard to stay mad at a guy who's so darn nice, right?

Mind you, Trudeau is probably right to play this card since being a "nice" guy is the essence of what makes him a successful politician.

Simply put, if people like a particular politician because he or she is nice, they're more likely to vote for that politician, even if that politician is mired in a scandal.

Examples of other politicians who were helped by their likability factor include Ronald Reagan, Barack Obama and Jack Layton.

My point is, while being a nice guy isn't totally necessary to get elected, e.g. Donald Trump and Stephen Harper, it sure helps — likability is a key political asset.

Besides most politicians want to be liked, and most political parties love to have a leader who can win an election based on his or her charming demeanor, as this spares them the necessity of having to involve themselves in complicated and possibly controversial things such as promoting an ideology or coming up with policy platforms.

This probably explains, for instance, why, after Trudeau trounced "tough guy" Stephen Harper in the 2015 federal election, the Conservative Party of Canada opted to select as its new leader, a nice guy of its own — Andrew Scheer.

As a matter of fact, soon after he became their leader the Conservatives rushed out video ads, showing off Scheer as a likable, middle class, suburban dad, who loved to stroll in the park and play with his kids.

In short, the message was, Scheer is nice.

Yet, unfortunately for the Conservatives, while Trudeau wraps up his niceness in a blanket of charisma, Scheer's niceness is buried under layers of stultifying blandness.

Even worse, the Liberals quickly stripped away Scheer's veneer of niceness, as they ruthlessly and relentlessly pushed the idea that the Conservative leader couldn't truly be nice since he was a devout Roman Catholic, and that automatically means he must be some sort of papist, black-hearted, religious bigot.

Scheer also suffered from one negative side effect of niceness: it can sometimes be confused with weakness, and he often looked weak.

Now, of course, the Conservatives are currently in the midst of a leadership race, which means they're trying to figure out if they should go with a tough as nails leader, i.e. Erin O'Toole or attempt to go the "nice guy" route again with Peter MacKay (who promises to be nice without any non-nice social conservative entanglements.)

Then there's the case of NDP leader Jagmeet Singh, who, at first, like Scheer wanted to "out nice" Trudeau.

In the last federal election, for example, Singh launched a blitzkrieg of nice in an all-out attempt to win over our hearts.

But alas for him and his party, it fizzled out.

Perhaps this explains why Singh has, of late, dropped the nice guy routine, and adopted the angryself-righteous, non-compromising rhetoric of militant woke activists.

Only time will tell if this new edgy approach works for Singh.

Meanwhile Trudeau will continue to flood the country with his niceties, because I suspect that's all he really can do.

So, rest assured, the WE Scandal, the COVID-19 pandemic, the $343 billion deficit, our diplomatic relations with China, all these things will be dealt with by the prime minister in the nicest ways possible.

Trudeau's hoping, in other words, that nice guys do finish first.

Photo Credit: CBC News

The views, opinions and positions expressed by columnists and contributors are the author’s alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of our publication.