LP_468x60
ontario news watch
on-the-record-468x60-white
and-another-thing-468x60

Take a breath, everyone, before plowing yet more taxpayer dollars into the oil and gas industry.

The federal and provincial governments have built elaborate scaffolding to keep the ailing energy sector on its feet.  The federal government bought the TransMountain Pipeline and the provincial government invested in the Keystone pipeline.

In light of the double whammy of COVID-19 and plummeting oil prices both governments put money into cleaning up orphaned oil wells.

Ottawa has promised $750 million to cut methane emissions and expanded credit lines for some small-and-medium-sized oil companies through Economic Development Canada and the Business Development Bank of Canada.

Alberta earlier temporarily waived fees companies pay to the Alberta Energy Regulator, amounting to an estimated $113 million.

But all that is not enough, says Alberta Premier Jason Kenney and the oil patch executives in Calgary's wobbling glass towers.

As international oil prices slid into unheard of negative territory over last weekend Kenney was already tweeting about the urgent need for "significantly more action".

He has suggested the federal government should offer more credit backstop for the industry, somewhere in the range of $15 billion to $30 billion.

Some industry executives are proposing the federal government take preferred equity stakes in oil and gas companies, according to the Financial Post.

CPC Leader Andrew Scheer said the federal government should use broader financial tools to help the sector, without specifying which tools he has in mind.

The underlying argument for propping up private sector oil and gas companies is the familiar "too big to fail" position.

Kenney argues hundreds of thousands of jobs are at stake in an industry that has paid more than $350 billion into government coffers.

"We simply cannot afford to see that industry permanently impaired," he proclaimed at a press conference this week.

But are government coffers up to saving Alberta's energy companies?  Strained to the limit by the ongoing emergency programs to mitigate the economic and healthcare crisis of COVID-19, is this the most urgent priority for public dollars?

On Wednesday the futures market price for oil recovered slightly.  And there seems to be some acknowledgement from OPEC and Russia that faster and more production curbs are necessary.

So despite the heightened shrillness of the call for an energy industry bail out, it would be prudent to see where prices trend over a longer period before government takes any more expensive action.

And should it take action that directly favours specific companies or groups of companies in the market?  Picking winners and losers is a mug's game for any government.

Keeping the lions away from the weak members of the oil and gas herd is just not the responsibility of taxpayers.

The global economic slowdown is affecting just about all sectors of the economy.  Retail, manufacturing, hospitality and the arts are all in drastic straits.

There is lots of precedent for government wading into helping the private sector.  Kenney cites the whack of dough the feds gave General Motors in 2009 as an example.  It's a pretty flawed example, given that General Motors has shrunk its Canadian presence drastically over the intervening decade.

Governments have also invested directly in oil and gas companies in this country.  Progressive Conservative Premier Peter Lougheed created the Alberta Energy Corporation in the early 1970s to kickstart exploration and development in the province.  Faced with artificial oil shortages in the same decade the federal government took a major ownership position with PetroCanada.

But investing tax dollars directly into the business of exploration and production in a sector which is clearly in its declining decades could be a huge political and fiscal liability.

Some companies will certainly go under because of the current upheaval.  But the underlying resource the industry is built on will still be there, and it is owned by the people of Alberta.  If oil and gas are still in demand when the dust settles, new players will arise.

Ultimately Jason Kenney, who cut his conservative teeth on a position with the Canadian Taxpayers Federation, needs to adhere to the precept that government should be staying out of the private sectors' purview.

Photo Credit: The Canadian Press

The views, opinions and positions expressed by columnists and contributors are the author’s alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of our publication.


Maybe it's the slow grind of being in isolation.  Maybe it's the miserable weather.  I'm not really sure what it is, but my optimism for the what comes after this pandemic has worn away.

I wasn't coming into this with the idea that things were going to be great after this, but I had some hope we'd come out the other side with something better that what we went into it with.

It's only been six — seven? eight? — weeks, but I see now that was foolish.

The more I think about it, the more I see that we're going to come out of this with things just as they were before.

Take this brief column on CBC News, written by an anonymous 58-year-old grocery store worker.  In it, the woman describes the day-to-day grinding misery working the cash in a pandemic.

Because of restrictions and limits placed on items because of, you know, the state of the world, some people aren't able to buy as much as they might like of this or that.  So, those people will take it out on the cashier, the most visible of the staff, and also the least responsible for the state of things.

What is that like for our cashier?  Really bad, actually:

"You get talking with the other cashiers and ask, why are we are doing this?  Why are we risking our lives to get crapped on?"

"Yet the worst thing is knowing that others are safe at home, collecting their $2,000, while we get up, go to work, risk our lives and don't make nearly that much, even with the $2 per hour raise.  I'm supporting my whole household on my lousy 20 hours a week."

And that's the thing, isn't it?  While most of us are in the relative safety of home, stuck with the horrors of video calls and having to make our own coffee, much of the world is still out there working.  And here we are, complaining we can only get two sticks of butter at a time.

Ah, but don't worry, these grocery workers are the heroes of all this.  Occasionally customers will give her a Tim Hortons or McDonald's gift certificate.  This last line from her story nearly broke me:

"I actually had a lady today say to me, 'Wow, you guys realize you're going to be in the history books?  You'll be in the history books that when this horrific pandemic came, you were one of those cashiers that went to work and risked your life.' "

That's what we've offering people as reward, the promise of eternal glory as a faceless mass of people.  We seem to have contented ourselves as a society to call these people heroes and leave it at that.  What more do they need?

The cashier says she's got her daughter and two young grandchildren at home, and she's just trying to get by on 20 hours a week.  And this is the best we can do for her?  A $2 raise and the possibility of a meal or a snack now and then.  Maybe when it's all over, a tomb of the unknown cashier.

Ah, but let's check in on the corporate offices of our beloved grocers, shall we?

Metro Inc., one of the country's biggest grocers reported its quarterly earnings Wednesday.  The company saw its revenue jump year-over-year by 7.8 percent when compared to the second quarter last year.  Of the $287 million jump in sales the company saw, they attribute $125 million to the pandemic.

It's pathetic of us, of all of us.  Because this is the way of things.  The grocers and their shareholders see hundreds of millions of dollars roll in, and hand out paltry raises for everyone else.

Take this for an example, Anthony Longo, CEO of the eponymous Longo's grocery chain, talked to the Financial Post for a story on grocery executives spending time in grocery stores during the pandemic.  Longo says he's been making in-person visits to stores, and even helping stock the odd shelf, to buck up the staff while COVID-19 has been rampaging through the country.

"We do have quite a number of people who don't feel safe, and that's an issue in the industry," Longo told the Financial Post.  "We want people to know that it is safe.  I'm out there."

Of course, that's easy for Longo to say.  He's the head of the family that owns the business.  His time dipping in and out of stores to raise morale isn't being paid at $14 or $15 per hour or whatever the rest of the staff is.  He's an executive.  And he's not there, day after day, being exposed to the virus just to make a living.

The Post story has a few other examples of executives putting in some time on the ground.  And, sure, it's great a few sales executives returned to the store to work among the rest of the staff, but did they take a corresponding pay cut?  Heh.

I hadn't really intended going into this to make this just about grocery stores.  But they are so emblematic of the problems within our society, and lay bare how little we're willing to do to improve things for the person stocking the shelves or mopping the floors, filling our bags.

We could take a look at nurses and PSWs in hospitals and long-term care homes.  Or delivery drivers.  Or rent relief programs that give money directly to landlords.  Or any number of people still out there, still working, while many of us are in the safety of home.  Grocery stores are just one facet of the same shit-diamond.

We're trying to do just enough to keep them from being beaten entirely into the ground by unimaginable circumstances.  A few bucks an hour is all these companies are willing to give the workers that they rely on — that we all rely on — to get groceries out the door.  A Tim Hortons card here and there should keep them from the barricades.

And we seem okay with it.

So, when I say I've lost optimism, this is why.  The massive burdens we've always put on the working class have only grown with the spectre of illness and death hanging over the people keeping our society working.

We should do better by them, but we won't.  We never have.  Why would I have expected it to be any different?

Photo Credit: Toronto Star

The views, opinions and positions expressed by columnists and contributors are the author’s alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of our publication.


In the end, the Conservatives had to fold.  Andrew Scheer had been calling for the resumption of debates in the House of Commons as of Monday, as provided for in a motion that was adopted unanimously five weeks ago.  Scheer won that point and the House did sit on Monday.

For the Liberals, the least amount of time they have to spend in the House, the better.  For, while Justin Trudeau may claim that our institutions must continue to operate not in spite of, but because of the crisis, it was fairly easy to argue there was no need to resume partisan debates at the expense of public health.  For the Conservatives, three in-person sittings with a reduced number of MPs, about thirty, was the bare minimum.

All weekend, the pressure was one-sided against Scheer.  The Bloc Quebecois, the NDP and the Green Party were all siding with the government and wanting to proceed with one in-person sitting each week, and "virtual" sittings to be conducted through videoconferencing.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau accused Andrew Scheer of being "irresponsible" for wanting to force 338 MPs to sit on Monday.  A blatant lie, of course, as that was never going to happen, which was proven by the NDP announcing that no matter what, they were sending only 3 MPs to Ottawa.  The Green parliamentary leader Elizabeth May stated she was "distressed" by Scheer's push.  Bloc leader Yves-François Blanchet spoke of the Conservatives "tataouinage", which could be loosely translated as "screwing around".

Scheer's Conservatives were refusing to do what was expected during  the current pandemic.  They wouldn't stay home!  Yet, there was a case to make about the importance of parliamentary oversight and accountability, certainly, but Scheer's sales pitch wasn't flying with the public opinion.

Since March 13, the proceedings of the House of Commons have been suspended.  Without this unique arena, Conservative, Bloc and New Democrat MPs were unable to interrogate the government directly on its efforts to counter the pandemic and provide economic assistance.  Sure, you can hold your own press conferences, in the hopes that journalists' will pick up on your efforts so that you can make your way into the daily coverage.  But even that has its limit: too often, journalists will follow up on the opposition's points and raise them at one government press briefings or another, and the answer will generate the news, without much space given to the opposition party that first brought the issue forward.

Already in these dangerous times, governments are pretty much getting all the ice-time.  Daily updates from the Prime Minister, federal ministers, public health officials, you name it.  Add to that premiers, mayors and the international stage.  The voices of the opposition parties were already considerably weakened.  Hence why the Conservatives were hoping to reopen Parliament.

And the Conservatives were right about wanting to hold the government to account.  The opposition should have questions and demand answers.  There is always a risk that when you criticize the government, you will be in turn criticized for not participating in the collective effort.  But if you give the government a blank cheque, you are not challenging it to do better.  So it won't.

It is too bad that Parliament cannot reopen fully, because opposition parties must be able to hold the government to account.  Parliament is an essential service.  Questions should be asked.  Answers should be provided.  And it can be useful, as proven by the two Question Periods that were held Monday.

But since the beginning of the pandemic, the Conservatives' tone has felt out of place.  Scheer has been incisive and critical.  CPC leadership candidates Peter MacKay and Erin O'Toole have been time and time again strident and vociferous on social media.  While Conservative Premiers, especially Doug Ford, have been publicly gracious towards the federal government, the federal Conservatives seemed, at times, tone-deaf to what was going on.  Team Canada?  Forget about it.

That, more than anything, is why the Conservatives failed to secure more in-person sittings.  The CPC has been dropping in the polls for weeks now.  They were not getting traction on the issue of parliamentary oversight, people were not listening.  Andrew Scheer was isolated from his fellow opposition leaders.  As a lame-duck leader, Scheer doesn't have the full support, let alone control of his party.

Meanwhile in the UK, the Mother of Parliaments Westminster, will meet three times a week, with 50 MPs in person and the 600 others able to do so virtually.  In Canada, the House of Commons has formally adjourned until May 25th, the Senate until June 2nd.  A special committee, with every MP a member, will meet once weekly in person but not all at once, of course.  Virtual meetings will occur online twice a week once technological and procedural issues have been worked out.  Which could take weeks.

Of note, the Conservatives gave their unanimous consent to allow a minister of the Crown to move a motion concerning the proceedings of the House and its committees.  A motion they knew they would lose.  Seems like they figured it wasn't worth dying on that Hill anymore.

Photo Credit: CBC News

The views, opinions and positions expressed by columnists and contributors are the author’s alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of our publication.