LP_468x60
ontario news watch
on-the-record-468x60-white
and-another-thing-468x60

I found myself in self-isolation boredom this week re-watching my favourite Fawlty Towers episodes, and aside from realizing how racist that show was at times I cannot stop thinking about this exchange:

"Manuel: What is Nitwit?

Basil Fawlty: It doesn't matter.  Look, it doesn't matter.  Oh, I can spend the rest of my life having this conversation.  Now, please, please, try to understand before one of us dies."

This exchange sums up my feelings related to a certain lame-duck, tone-death, light-weight Conservative leader who has decided to make clamouring for in-person meetings of Parliament into his swan song.

Andrew Scheer is a nitwit.

He's like one of those conservative Republican pastors in the US who insists on having in-person church services, and then is himself admitted to ICU.

Canada can figure out a sensible way to conduct parliamentary business mostly virtually — and Scheer standing in the way is wasting valuable time on a stunt.

Scheer is engaging in irresponsible, nonsensical behaviour.  Westminster has figured out how to host Parliament virtually, and the UK has nearly double the number of MPs, and — shall we just say — more than a passing fancy for traditionalism.  (And yes, they do translation in that multinational country, too.)

Nonetheless, Premier Jason Kenney was quick to point out that the British Parliament sat during the Blitz — as if a nighttime aerial bombardment was remotely comparable to a virus pandemic with asymptomatic spread.

For his part, Tory puerile pit bull, Pierre Poilievre, tweeted this week, "Gov says opening Parl would mean massive influx of staff.  FALSE: -We don't need political aids there.  They can communicate w MPs by email/text."  I'm not sure conceding parliamentary business can be done by email/text helps his point, but no matter.

More to the point — I cannot imagine this grandstanding is good politics.  Other than Conservative MPs and their staff cosplaying as latter-day Churchills, the average Canadian could not care less about this as an issue.

My mother, a Red Tory with more than a passing interest in politics, asked me this week if Scheer was kicking up a fuss to ensure he received his regular per diem expenses, because she could not fathom another reason why he would repeatedly relocate his family across the country during a pandemic.  I do not believe that is the case, but it just goes to show how incomprehensible Scheer's antics are to even engaged citizens (and how lethal his scandal having all his expenses paid for by others actually was).

I do not, for the life of me, understand why the Canadian Tories would seize on such a self-serving issue, one that has no actual impact on everyday people.  My only conclusion is it is some perverse combination of taking their cues from the Republican approach in the States, plus a desire to get to engage in some cheap amateur dinner theatre under the auspices of the Westminster system.  That, and getting to be on TV more equally to the PM.

I also firmly believe that this is yet more evidence political lifers are destroying our politics.  Scheer has never had a real job (see, scandal about faking being an insurance broker).

Which leads me to the one Tory whose stock has risen during this crisis: Doug "I tells it like it is" Ford.  Ford's business-like, workmanlike, blunt approach is rightly winning kudos.  He quickly jettisoned his policies that would look, well, bad in a pandemic, and is working to get along well with all levels of government.

It's almost like he's "running it like a business": cooperative, focused on results, not grandstanding.  I'll even allow him the occasional photo opp picking up PPE.

Speaking of photo opps, my hometown MP, Scot Davidson, also a Tory business guy, is showing how a quiet, get-stuff-done approach can work: he'll drop off congratulatory anniversary plaques at peoples' homes, deliver food to the Food Bank, bring coffee to the fire department.  It's small things but productive things — and I am here for it.

Andrew Scheer, Pierre Poilievre and their ilk could learn something from their businessmen Tory brethren: cut the crap, and focus on results.

Photo Credit: CBC News

The views, opinions and positions expressed by columnists and contributors are the author’s alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of our publication.


The familiar voice at the other end of the line laughed, a bit.

"They're making fun of the way I look and sound, again," he says, sounding not at all upset.  "I love it when they underestimate me."

The voice belonged to the Right Honourable Jean Chretien, naturally, and the call had come in early Fall of 2000.

For the ruling Liberal Party, it was an uncertain time.  Rumours were circulating that finance minister Paul Martin was not going to run again.  Newspaper baron Conrad Black was threatening to use his newspaper chain to punish Chretien for denying him a knighthood.  Meanwhile, the nascent Canadian Alliance was surging in the polls, and some of the Grit caucus members were grumbling that Chretien should resign.

But Chretien was unfazed.  For nearly 40 years, his opponents had mocked his looks, his language skills, and his mental acuity.  For years, he had been wallpapering his home with his political obituaries.  And, for years, he kept winning.

It happened again in 2000, too when Canadian Alliance leader Stockwell Day had dared him to call an election.

So, he did.  He captured many more seats than he did in the previous election, in 1997.

Surveying the political landscape Down South, during a devastating pandemic some 20 years later, I'm reminded of that "chit chat," as Chretien refers to his telephone calls to friends.

And I'm reminded of it, particularly, when I hear what Trumpkins on both sides of the border have to say about Joe Biden.  Namely: that he has dementia.  That he's senile.  That he acts inappropriately.  That he has too many scandals.  That he's yesterday's man.

Because that's exactly what Conservatives used to say about Jean Chretien.  Word for word.

The attacks on Biden will be as ineffective as the attacks were against Chretien, for the same reason: both men are cut from the same cloth.

Joe Biden kicked off his winning campaign in a comparatively low-key way: he released a video on YouTube.  He said he was running to beat Donald Trump, because he was the only candidate who could.  And, in the interim, successive polls have shown that Americans know who Joe is, they like who he is, and they like him way more than Trump.

He's competitive with multiple demographics: African-Americans, older Democrats, Independents, the true working class.

Joe Biden has what it takes to win, mainly because he never forgot his roots.  He never stopped boasting about his hardscrabble Scranton, Pa. youth.  He grew up in a big, poor Irish Catholic family in Scranton in a crowded apartment, not a gilded Fifth Avenue penthouse apartment and the Bidens were forced to move to Delaware when Joe was ten, where his father secured a job as a used car salesman.

He got into law school only because he got a scholarship.  He participated in anti-segregation sit-ins.  He struggled for everything he got.

Joe Biden isn't just like Jean Chretien: some days, he seems like he is Jean Chretien.

They'll keep underestimating him, however, just like they did Chretien.

Like Chretien, Biden didn't win the top job the first time he ran for it.  But he won it and is the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee at precisely the right time.  When his country is hurting, and when it desperately needs healing.

Like Chretien, Biden has an Everyman appeal that cuts across demographic categories which is why Biden won the overwhelming support of African-Americans in the South Carolina primary at the start of March, and why he never looked back.

Like Chretien, Biden often doesn't seem to speak any of the official languages but he has an innate ability to connect with voters, at a gut level, that conservative politicians too often don't.

Like Chretien, too, Biden's timing is just right.  Chretien returned to politics when Canada was being riven by endless Constitutional wars, and the growing threat of separatism, and he helped keep us together.

Biden has returned to politics at a similarly historic moment after too many years of the racism and madness of Donald Trump, and a deadly pandemic that has claimed the lives of tens of thousands of Americans.

If Jean Chretien were to have one of his chit-chats with Joe Biden, I'm pretty sure I know what he'd say.

"They're underestimating you again," he'd say.  "And that's always good, for guys like you and me."

Photo Credit: The Globe & Mail

The views, opinions and positions expressed by columnists and contributors are the author’s alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of our publication.


The personal income tax filing deadline is approaching fast and, contrary to last year, the Federal government has not shown any flexibility about pushing it back because of the pandemic.

As the third wave hits some areas hard, a lot of people are following stay-at-home orders.  The sanitary measures, especially in hot zones in Quebec and Ontario, have created a situation similar to last year.  The pandemic is slowing things down.

Parents are struggling with organizing their papers, having to handle their own teleworkload and deal with their kids' online schooling.  Accountants are also not able to be as productive, partly because many taxpayers continue to hand over paper documents.  Many will not send by e-mail or snail mail, fearing for confidentiality.  They want to deliver them by hand.  But they won't get out of the house!  Is tax return production essential?  It's not exactly like buying groceries.

For accountants, it is difficult to deal with the volume as the perfect storm of tax deadline and confinement measures are hitting simultaneously.  In a teleworking environment, business equipment is not readily accessible to scan and make copies.  Add to that the complication created by the different support programs, teleworking credits and other measures, it actually takes longer for each report to be produced.

All that to say that many will miss the tax deadline and will face penalties and interest.  That number is lower than last year, but it doesn't matter.  Governments need to give people and workers a break instead of adding to their current stress level.

In that sense, many Canadian municipalities have announced they would not impose penalties or interest for missed delays.  The United States has extended its deadline to May 17, an additional month.

In Quebec, after initially saying no, following an inquiry from Liberal MNA André Fortin, Revenu Minister Éric Girard announced on April 15th that Quebeckers who file their tax return after the April 30 deadline would face no late filing penalty and no interest charged on a 2020 tax balance from May 1-31, 2021.  To his credit, Girard did his homework after Fortin's questions: while tax filings were on a good pace early in the year, he checked with his officials and the new data showed the pace had dropped rapidly after Quebec imposed stricter measures.  The same is no doubt true elsewhere.

However, the Government of Canada is dragging its feet on the issue.  The word is that CRA is refusing to extend the deadline because people are going to have to pay a lot of taxes after receiving CERB.  They don't want to drag out the outcry.  If true, this is short-sighted.  And it's not like getting this money now will make any dent in the current deficit.

CPA Canada, the organisation representing accountants, has made its case for extending the deadline with the feds.  To no avail.  Even though there is a clear need for many firms, especially smaller ones, and for their clients, to see that deadline extended, they are hitting a wall.  "If relief was needed last year, then it is difficult to understand why it is not needed again this year, especially for those (…) in areas with heightened variant risks and case counts," CPA stated.  Hard to argue with that.

After the Quebec government's announcement, one would have thought the Federal government would have followed suit shortly after.  Both governments coordinated their tax return relief efforts last year.  The silence meant the issue was raised in the House of Commons the very day Quebec made its announcement.

First, NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh brought it up: "On top of this third wave, tax season is upon us.  People need help, as they risk losing the benefits they need.  We need to help people.  Will the Prime Minister commit to giving Canadians more time to file their taxes, as he did in the first wave?"

Revenue Minister Diane Lebouthillier answered in a murky fashion, by reading a prepared statement:

"Our government understands that this tax season is stressful for Canadians.  We will continue to be there for them every step of the way.  In February, we announced that recipients of the emergency and recovery benefits would be eligible for interest relief if they filed their 2020 tax returns.  The Canada Revenue Agency has also put in place robust taxpayer relief provisions that grant them relief from penalties or interest incurred for reasons beyond their control.  These measures ensure that Canadians who need help during tax season will get it. "

So if you miss the deadline, do people lose their benefits?  Are the 3rd wave and the sanitary measures in place reasons beyond their control?  Who knows?

CPC MP Jacques Gourde was not satisfied.  After pointing out administrative problems the Canada Revenue Agency is currently having, which adds to the slower pace, Gourde picked up on Singh's line of questioning: "Canadians will have a hard time producing the necessary documents to file their 2020 tax return by the April 30 deadline.  Can the government extend the filing deadline without penalizing Canadian taxpayers?"

Lebouthilier answered, again:

"Our government understands full well that this is a stressful tax season for all Canadians.  We will continue to be there for them every step of the way.  In February, we announced that recipients of the emergency and recovery benefits would be eligible for interest relief if they filed their 2020 tax returns.  The Canada Revenue Agency has also put in place robust taxpayer relief provisions that grant them relief from penalties or interest incurred for reasons beyond their control.  These measures will ensure that Canadians who need help during tax season will get it."

You get a prize if you find the six differences in Lebouthiller's answers.  A robot would be more creative.  What you will not find, however, is any sense of compassion for people, any sense of clarity and certainly not a much needed extension after 400 days of pandemic.

And that is a real shame.

Photo Credit: CBC News

The views, opinions and positions expressed by columnists and contributors are the author’s alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of our publication.