LP_468x60
on-the-record-468x60-white

On March 19 the Alberta government announced free access to whiz -bang medical app Babylon by Telus Health so patients could meet with Alberta-licensed physicians through their smartphone.

Health Minister Tyler Shandro was quoted in the release saying "This app … comes at a time when our health system is actively asking people to self-isolate as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.  Using this app is an alternative to visiting physicians face-to-face when you're not sure if your symptoms are related to the novel coronavirus or at any other time."

It looked like a win-win to the government: Babylon feeds into the isolation principles of the official Covid-19 response; it could help out Albertans without access to a regular family doctor and since it is contracted under an alternative relationship plan (ARP) it played neatly into the UCP government's determination to break the fee-for-service model used by most Alberta doctors.

The resulting tornado of protest from doctors and the opposition proves that even in this time of crisis, there is still some requirement for governments to think out all the ramifications before acting.

The opposition and other critics jumped just as quickly as they would have during more normal times on the perceived threat to public medicare.  Telus is partnering with UK-based heath tech firm Babylon to offer the service.  While the province's doctors are asking for a universal telehealth solution so all doctors can meet virtually with patients, it appears the province is promoting a private company with a small cadre of contracted doctors.

For doctors who did want to meet virtually or by phone with patients during the current pandemic, the province initially proposed to revive a billing code offering $20 a visit.  Doctors pointed at the richer $38 deal with Babylon doctors and howled.  The government caved and bumped the virtual billing code up to match the Babylon compensation.

The NDP opposition jumped on the issue of privacy concerns.  Telus may be seen as benign in its western Canadian home, but its partner Babylon is a foreign-owned entity.  Patients health details and actual virtual doctors' visits will be stashed in offshore servers.

Nonsense, said the Alberta health ministry, the doctors are covered by all the relevant privacy requirements.  Unfortunately the Babylon Telus Health privacy policy includes the usual complement of scary boilerplate such as: "video recording of patient visits is copied and stored on Babylon's servers, and that the video may be shared with corporate partners and entities outside of Canada, including foreign governments."

Telus Health filed the necessary initial documents with the province's privacy commission, but a full privacy review won't be completed for a year, the commission informed CBC.

The Alberta Medical Association has mounted a concerted campaign against Babylon, which was not the subject of prior consultation between the government and AMA.  Patients can't see their regular family doctor through the app, nor are they guaranteed of seeing the same physician on Babylon more than once, argues the association.

"This type of care results in fragmentation and disruption of continuity of care," says AMA President Christine Molnar in a public statement.

She argues that the Babylon doctors, without familiarity with a patient's history and continuing treatment plan, will order up more tests, specialist referrals and hospitalizations, resulting in more cost to the system.

Molnar says the government needs to stop advertising for one private option, but rather provide virtual options for all provincial doctors.  And if doctors are allowed to continue virtual care after the pandemic, all doctors, not just Telus Health doctors, need to have equal access.

Babylon has only inflamed the battle which continues between the government and the doctors over recent provincial budget's tightening of physician payments and general healthcare cutbacks.

The government has been put somewhat on the defensive over Babylon, although it hasn't offered to dump the contract, as the NDP has demanded.

Health Ministry spokesman Steve Buick has told reporters the platform is not intended to replace the family doctors.

"It provides a new and convenient option for publicly funded virtual physician visits to supplement existing services," he told CBC in an email.

Premier Jason Kenney's director of issues management Matt Wolf is leading the Twitter pushback, basically telling critics the app is optional so if they don't like it, don't use it.

Whether Babylon was an attempt to begin sliding privatized medicare into the province or an effort to help out vulnerable Albertans at a time of high anxiety, the whole initiative could have used a bit more thought. 

The views, opinions and positions expressed by columnists and contributors are the author’s alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of our publication.


Is this what the world falling apart looks like?  It certainly feels like something is breaking.

Obviously, the coronavirus rampaging through the world is breaking our day-to-day lives, but I mean something deeper.  Society as we know it is undergoing some permanent shifts.  And fault lines that we've long papered over are being exposed.

The government passed a rescue package with direct help for people, and other supports for business, in an effort to keep the economy from collapsing in on itself.

The shorthand version of that means that sometime soon people who have felt some kind of income disruption because of the virus will be able to apply for $2,000 per month in emergency benefits.  We're told that after the online application system goes live in early April, benefits will be heading out the door in 10 days.

This relies on a lot of things going right.  For starters, it assumes the application website is going to work properly from the get go.  In the best of circumstances, this is a big ask.  These are not the best of times.  Particularly for a federal government who have — for years â€” been unable to properly pay their own staff.

But no matter how valid and reasonable those logistical issues are, it's going to be of little concern to the people with landlords and bill collectors breathing down their necks at the start of the month before any of this even goes live.

Take B.C. as a fun example.  They announced Wednesday that evictions would be suspended, which is good, and the province would be giving up to $500 in rent support, which also sounds good.  But, not so fast.  Just because this is being billed as renters assistance, does not actually make it so.  Turns out that up-to-$500 will be sent directly to landlords.

So, in the province home the epicentre of the housing crisis, that is now also experiencing a massive societal shock has decided the best way to help renters is to… help landlords.  They are feeling pressure too, you see.

Unless of course you forget that just last week Canada's biggest banks agreed to defer mortgage payments for six months for owners unable to meet their payments because of the crisis.  You can see the imbalance there.  Landlords can apply for a deferment on their payments — as half-assed as those may be — so they can keep their home and maybe cover some other expenses.  But renters?  Oh-ho, renters can apply for the privilege of putting money directly in the pocket of their landlords.

Lest that not be enough of a slap in the face to the idea of assistance to renters that money won't be getting to landlords on April 1.  What to do?  Well, there's this, from B.C. Premier John Horgan: "[Tenants] have a relationship with your landlord.  Let's hope that they're good relationships, and you're going to have to find a way to work this out together," he said, according to CBC News.

Quite the rescue.

This is what I mean by the fault lines of our society coming to the surface.  We're in the barrel of an unimaginable crisis, and even still we're doing these half-measures that can't be too helpful, or come without strings.  God forbid John Q. Renter ends up spending some of that assistance money on food or something.  The B.C. government is trusting landlords to be understanding, but not with renters to pay their rent if they're given assistance.

Let's remember that people are staying home from work — or have been outright laid off — and many of them aren't getting paid through all this.  They're doing this so they don't die, and so they don't maybe take two or three people with them.

And still the government is waffling on whether people should rot in the destitution forced on them by a global pandemic.

We haven't seen the application process for federal assistance, so god only knows what sort of caveats and stings await us in the rest of the country.  Knowing the way this government operates, there are sure to be plenty.

Not only are we looking at a massive economic shock like we did in 2008, but many of us will be losing friends and family over the coming months.  If governments are not going to take seriously the necessity of keeping people from destitution, we're also going to be looking at the break down of more than just the stock market.

We cannot expect people to continue buying into the idea of a country, if when things become truly dire that country doesn't put the bulk of its efforts into keeping the people in the lower strata from being cast aside.

We keep hearing from our leaders how we are all in this together.  But as more and more of these rescue programs are being rolled out, we're seeing glimpses of how some of us are being deemed more worthy of support than others.

It's going to take more than soothing words from behind a pulpit to convince people their governments are there for them.  What we are facing is far too stark and horrible to be papered over.  Reality will shine through, for better or for worse.

For all our sakes, I hope it's for better.

Photo Credit: CBC News

The views, opinions and positions expressed by columnists and contributors are the author’s alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of our publication.


When it became more and more evident that the Covid-19 pandemic was upon us, Parliamentarians were amongst the first to lead by example and implement social distancing measures, shutting down Parliament.

But on Friday March 13, MPs not only agreed to suspend their work to allow the government to better deal with the coronavirus crisis, they also agreed to rush through the adoption of three Bills to give the government the capacity to intervene financially.

The Supplementary Estimates for the fiscal year ending on March 31, 2020, and the interim supply for the fiscal year ending on March 31, 2021 have been approved.  Similarly, Bill C-12, an Act to amend the Financial Administration Act, was adopted at all stages to give the capacity to the government to obtain additional funds to deal with the emergency while Parliament is not in session, albeit with certain reporting obligations to Parliament

MPs did so by adopting by unanimous consent a motion that included a series of measures, including provisions to adopt these Bills at all stages, even though they had not even passed First Reading.  You read it correctly, they had not even been introduced in the House of Commons.

In other words, MPs adopted Bills that they had not seen!  Talk about blank cheques: extraordinary times calls for extraordinary measures and in these times of crisis, all MPs, from all parties, gave their ultimate confidence vote for the minority government of Justin Trudeau.

Fast forward 11 days, days in which the Federal government acted with more or less haste as the crisis grew.  The federal aid, an $ 82 billion package divided in many different measures and programs, was announced by Prime Minister Trudeau last week, but in order to adopt the new fiscal measures and put in place its emergency plan, the government had to recall Parliamentarians this week.  Parliament needed to adopt the necessary legislation to allow for the implementation of the government's plan.

Still working on a good faith basis, and despite the differences of opinions all parties have had with the Liberals on the different measures being taken to tackle the crisis, they were all ready to show up to work, in reduced numbers as agreed, to adopt everything in an accelerated manner, once again.

All that good faith, all that good will, all that trust disappeared quickly when the opposition parties realized that the government was pushing forward more than they had announced.

They were not expecting that the government would take the opportunity to attempt an unprecedented power grab.

The draft legislation included a section granting the Finance Minister the unilateral power to increase, decrease, create or repeal taxes through regulation all the way to 2022, without parliamentary approval.  The modern version of taxation without representation!  The bill contained similar language and timelines regarding government borrowing and spending, all in the name of the coronavirus, all the way to December 31, 2021.  Parliamentary Budget Officer Yves Giroux stated that these new powers would be "unprecedented".  No doubt.

Conservatives were quite vocal in their opposition, calling it an overreach, along with the New Democrats.  And rightly so.  Others have stated that Justin Trudeau was simply trying to overturn the election results and give his government the means to govern as a majority.

Clearly, the government went too far.  But they mean well, you see.  I have no doubt in my mind that Liberals thought they were doing God's work when concocting their legislation.  Trust us, this is the best way to handle this.  Melanie Joly was clearly not seeing the problems with her government's approach: she explained that Parliament was too slow to allow the government to act with the speed and flexibility it needed.

Considering the lack of action from the government early on to slow the spread of the virus, the fact that a whole lot of measures that could have been, and were taken, are the prerogative of the executive such as closing the border Joly's argument is a bit rich.  Especially considering that, despite the poison pills, Parliament was able to adopt the revised legislation in 24 hours.

Yet, it could have been done and was supposed to be done faster.  Jagmeet Singh and Andrew Scheer both wanted the bill split: aid measures on one side; new powers on the other side.  Simple enough, but the government was not moved.  The House had been recalled at noon on Tuesday, and nothing happened until the wee hours of Wednesday morning.

Everything was happening behind the curtains, with a wild card waiting in the wings: Conservative MP Scott Reid, in defiance of his party, had shown up to use his Parliamentary privilege to say no to request for unanimous consent, as he thought he should have done on March 13th.  Was everything going to be stopped at such a crucial time?  Thankfully, it didn't.

Still, I find it hard to explain why the Trudeau government decided to operate this way.  It was obvious, by the opposition reaction, that this plan was not raised with them ahead of time.

It was not even hinted at.  And never did Prime Minister Trudeau, in one of his daily press conferences from Rideau Cottage where he is still in self-isolation, announce that this was his plan.  It is puzzling to realize that the government has not done any of the groundwork necessary to obtain the powers they sought.  In crisis management, the first rule is to communicate often, to communicate clearly, and to be transparent.  On all counts, the Liberals failed to do so with Bill C-13.

Were Liberals just pushing the limit to see what they could get away with?  I hope this was not simply a tactic of asking more than needed to obtain the new spending authority that they finally obtained, which is limited until September and to specific areas such as income support, purchase of medical supplies and other public health measures, including helping provinces and territories to pay for their own emergency response needs.  Because political capital was spent, distrust was sowed and energies misplaced.

Worse, for affected citizens, losing jobs, revenues, savings and possibly falling terribly ill and scared for their loved ones, watching this gong show was depressing.  And ultimately, that's on Justin Trudeau.

Photo Credit: CBC News

The views, opinions and positions expressed by columnists and contributors are the author’s alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of our publication.