LP_468x60
ontario news watch
on-the-record-468x60-white
and-another-thing-468x60

The old maxim tells that even though you might have the best of intentions in politics, that doesn't mean everyone is going to come into your tent.  And so it was when Prime Minister Trudeau unilaterally declared that all Canadians were guilty of genocide.

As one of those saintly figures who is just too good for the rough-and-tumble of political life, the Prime Minister is often far too kind to his opponents, allowing them to openly question his decisions.  Who could forget how the Opposition dishonestly campaigned on the idea that something called a "carbon tax" wouldn't actually be revenue neutral?  The whole thing could have been avoided if Trudeau had called it an "environmental competitiveness and job creation fundraiser", mostly because you can only say all those words maybe once in a 30-second commercial where change falls out of the air ducts.

In an ideal world, a Prime Minister should be allowed to proclaim that the country he leads was not only born in sin, but continues to perpetuate the very worst crime imaginable against an identifiable group, whenever and however he damn well pleases, without being criticized.  And, really, all he had to do was blame the genocide on a decade of Conservative cuts and he would have been in the clear.  If only the rest of us were so noble, as to resist the dreaded and hateful partisan impulse!

The problem with not blaming absolutely everything on the Conservatives is that creates the impression in some people's minds that the Liberals might be responsible, and that is just not the way we do things here in Canada.  Of course the idea that the Liberals would be responsible for genocide would never occur to anyone, but for the disinformation coming from the other side of the House.

It all goes back to the fact that Conservatives just can't sit there and wear the charge of genocide like they're supposed to, just like how they apparently can't sit there and be called uneducated, even when the data says that that's what they are.  Honestly!  Can you believe the absolute sense of entitlement?  The reeking, shameless privilege?  Let's not forget how these are the people who are constantly talking about freedom of speech.  Now they're mad just because someone went out of their way to make them mad?  Boo hoo!

Do you think generations of genocided Indigenous Canadians would have cried and whined on Twitter if they had been the subject of a totally harmless cartoon depicting them being led away in a straitjacket, like Minister of Fearful Tears and Jeers Lisa Macleod did?  I doubt it, because they were never given the opportunity, much less a Cabinet Minister's salary and 5 months summer vacation to boot.  Lisa Macleod needs to be Lisa MacQUIET if you ask me!  

This is why the Prime Minister cannot afford to be kind, as much as we would like him to.  He needs to take action immediately and make it clear that there are NOT "good people on both sides" here.  He needs to signal to Canadians that it is OK to fight back against the rising tide of populism using whatever means they have at their disposal before it's too late.

Imagine the boost to our international reputation if we had the courage to force Conservatives to see what it's like to have to live on reserves?  And imagine the huge step forward it would be for reconciliation if we charged Indigenous Canadians with the responsibility of forcing Conservatives onto those reserves with the full backing of the PMO?  (Not forever, of course- just until after the election is over.)  We'd probably get our seat on the UN Security Council back, at a minimum.  But more importantly, we'd finally be the truly fair country we tell ourselves that we are since we're sorry.

Photo Credit: Toronto Star

Written by Josh Lieblein

The views, opinions and positions expressed by columnists and contributors are the author’s alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of our publication.


I've come up with a modest proposal to make our wonderful Canadian summers a bit more wonderful.

My idea is this: why don't we put a total moratorium on the publication of any and all political opinion polls during the entire months of July and August?

In other words, during the whole summer, there'd no political polls published in any newspaper or broadcast on any TV news program or plastered on any website.

To my mind, such a ban would allow Canadians, from coast to coast, the opportunity to have a more restful and peaceful summer, free from the distraction of annoying polling pontificating, that inevitably comes in the wake of published polls.

Imagine it if you can a summer without all the boring and pointless media speculation as to which political party was ahead, which political party was behind and which political party had momentum.

Sounds nice, right?

And it's not as if we'd miss anything.

I mean, during the hazy, crazy, lazy days of summer, does anybody really want to know if Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's "net favorables" are up or down; or does anybody really care if public attitudes on the national debt are shifting or is anybody really curious as to whether Canadians "agree", or "strongly agree", or "disagree" or "strongly disagree" with Conservative Party leader Andrew Scheer's take on Canada's Food Guide?

I think not.

And yes, I know my proposal for a summer-time polling ban will meet with stiff resistance, especially from members of the political media, who just love to analyse, dissect and otherwise interpret the latest polling numbers.

Indeed, I strongly suspect that, if denied a weekly fix of Ipsos-Reid, or Ekos or Nanos, your typical political journalist or commentator would suffer from an extreme case of withdrawal.

By the way, I've always found the media's obsession with polling numbers to be a bit odd, since, even at the best of times, public domain political polls don't necessarily reflect actual voter attitudes.

And in the summer time public-domain polling accuracy is even more suspect.

For one thing, Canadians, who are never that much focussed on politics, are even less focussed on politics in the summer; who wants to think about politics when they're at the cottage, or frolicking on the beach, or flipping burgers on the barbecue?

Plus, people are harder for pollsters to reach during the summer months, which can sometimes skew results.

This might explain, for instance, why in the summer of 2016 many polls showed then Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton crushing her Republican opponent, Donald Trump.

As matter of fact, one poll published in July 2016, showed Clinton had a whopping 13 per cent lead.

It was only during the autumn months that polls started showing a tightening of the race.

Or consider that here in Canada, polls came out in the summer of 2015 indicating that NDP leader Thomas Mulcair was the frontrunner and that Liberal leader Justin Trudeau was trailing the pack in third place.

Of course, once the election got called and people became more focussed on politics, those numbers changed quickly.

So my point is, public polls commissioned in the dog days of summer, should be take with a massive grain of salt.

Yet that won't stop the media from using them to spin their narratives.

Mind you, Canada's political parties also make use of public polls in the summer months preceding a federal election.

If a party is ahead in the polls, it can whip up its base by saying, "Hey, we're close to winning this thing, send us money so we can seal the deal," or if it's behind in the polls it can say, "Hey, the other side is winning, stop being complacent, send us money so we can catch up."

This is why my plan to ban polls in the summer won't materialize, which is too bad, because I bet the people would support it.

Maybe I should commission a poll this month to find out?

Photo Credit: CBC News

The views, opinions and positions expressed by columnists and contributors are the author’s alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of our publication.