LP_468x60
ontario news watch
on-the-record-468x60-white
and-another-thing-468x60

We're coming up on the one-year anniversary of Doug Ford's election as Premier of Ontario, and things are getting contentious.  People are bringing replicas of guillotines to Queen's Park, PC MPP Sam Oosterhoff invoked Dr. Seuss to bring some much-needed gravitas to our country's non-existent abortion debate, and Bob Hepburn of the Toronto Star has updated his Worst Premier In The History of Ever rankings to put Doug Ford at the top.

All over the province, Ontarians are taking the bold step of publicly voicing displeasure with the Premier and his government.  Take the time he got booed at the Special Olympics… what's that?  You didn't know that he got booed at the Special Olympics?  That wasn't BREAKING NEWS in your world?  Well, wait till you hear about how he said that was the first time that he had ever been booed publicly, a statement that was IMMEDIATELY FACT CHECKED to reveal that he had actually been booed before, for saying that his doctor, dentist, and lawyer were Jewish.

Now, I'm not saying that we should embark on another one of these Draft John Tory movements that seem to take place every few years just because John Tory was cheered at the Special Olympics, except, that's exactly what I'm saying. I mean, he's the perfect candidate.  I know I said that about Patrick Brown before, but come on- why should we settle for the Mayor of some lowly burb when we could concentrate ALL the power in downtown Toronto, where it was always meant to be concentrated?  Do you feel like waiting for two hours on the 401 just to make the drive out to Brampton?  I don't think so!

For one thing, John Tory is not Doug Ford, which automatically makes him leadership material.  For another thing, he's already beaten Doug Ford, even though Doug Ford was just tagging in for his dying brother at the time, and the Mayor of Toronto is not the Premier of Ontario.  And for a third thing, even though the province elected Doug Ford in a landslide, Ontario is still Red Tory country (because we said so), and all the good little Red Tory piggies will go wee-wee-wee all the way back to their PROGRESSIVE home once John Tory puts his name on the ballot.  You can tell that the right is scared of John Tory because they circulated a video of the Toronto Mayor stuffing a $5 bill in a drag queen's thong through their dark money networks, and you can tell the left is scared of Tory because they were upset that he only tipped $5.

I can see it now: John Tory and Kathleen Wynne, embracing before a crowd of unenthusiastic partisans.  The sound of dutiful clapping and the occasional half-hearted "Woooo!" fills the air as Wynne gives up her seat of Don Valley West so Tory can finally claim it 12 years after the fact.  The insincere comments from Liberal functionaries (who never wanted her there in the first place) about how Wynne bowed out gracefully and is now somehow redeemed for blowing up the party, while a bunch of PC's in name only wonder why she was so unpopular.  A flashbulb pops as the Toronto Sun headline guys choose between JOHN LIBERAL and LIBERAL TORY, SAME OLD STORY.  Meanwhile, on Twitter, Warren Kinsella and Nick Kouvalis decide whether to renew their hostilities or not for the millionth time.  Will they put their differences aside to fight off Doug Ford and the forces of neofascist Trumpist white supremacist racist sexist homophobist populism, or will they put their differences aside to fight off John Tory and the greedy downtown gravy train riding champagne sipping elitist pigs at the trough?  The NDP puts up that picture of Doug whacking Tory with a cricket paddle and gets a few likes, which is enough to keep them excited for weeks.

I realize that the notion of John Tory as a Liberal saviour is a centrist hack's wet dream and is utterly cynical, but on the other hand, sometimes what you need to defeat a privileged businessman is an even more privileged businessman.   The centrist hacks got us into this mess, and by cracky, they're the ones who are going to get us out of it!

Photo Credit: Toronto Star

Written by Josh Lieblein

The views, opinions and positions expressed by columnists and contributors are the author’s alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of our publication.


When it comes to making predictions about Canada's next federal election, there's one thing I can guarantee without the slightest bit of hesitation.

At some point during his campaign, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau will utter words along these lines: "My fellow Canadians, this is the most important election in our nation's history; when you go to the polls you won't just be electing a government, you'll be deciding if we remain a civilized, tolerant Canada, or if will we descend into redneck, savage, barbarism?"

The reason I know this will happen is because it happens in every Canadian election.

The Liberals always paint themselves as Canada's only party with the proper moral and cultural mindset to govern; hence electoral failure for the Liberals automatically means chaos for the country, which is why, according to the Liberals and to their media allies, every federal election is the "most important election in our nation's history".

In a sense, the Liberals are using the same sort of "Too Big to Fail" argument corporations like to use whenever they're demanding taxpayer bailouts or sweetheart legal deals.

You know what I'm talking about, right?

Any time a big corporation is in deep financial or legal trouble due to its own corruption or inefficiency or incompetence, its executives will insist that if government doesn't come to their rescue it'll cause an economic Armageddon.

Likewise, come the next federal election, Trudeau will argue that no matter how corrupt or incompetent or inefficient his government might be, voters should still come to his rescue because if the Liberal party goes down in flames, it'll cause a political Armageddon.

Mind you, this sort of electoral appeal usually doesn't cut much ice with regular voters, but it will certainly resonate with the country's ruling classes, which views the Liberal Party as a bulwark protecting the Establishment's interests from the unwashed, vulgar masses inhabiting the hinterlands beyond the borders of Canada's major Eastern urban centres.

For this reason, the ruling classes corporate CEOs, cultural elites, academics would likely come to the Liberal Party's defence; for them the Liberals are simply "Too Establishment to Fail."

And make no mistake, for the Liberals to have the Establishment on their side is a pretty big advantage, since elites have lots of ways to influence and sway public opinion.

Yet, having elites as allies, also comes with a big political risk, i.e. it leaves the Liberals vulnerable to charges that they are out of touch with ordinary Canadians.

The Opposition parties, for example, can use the Establishment's support for the Liberals as a political weapon to bash the Prime Minister, saying something like, "Unlike the Liberals who only care about their rich and powerful friends, our party wants to put the interests of regular people first!"

It's an argument that can work.

This is how Donald Trump won the presidential election in 2016, this is how the forces promoting Brexit won in the United Kingdom, this is how populist parties in Europe are gaining support.

Yet, at least at the federal level, this doesn't seem to be a popular tactic here in Canada.

Conservative Party leader Andrew Scheer, for instance, seems reluctant to suggest he will do anything to upend the status quo; instead he's basically making the case that he can be counted on to manage the existing system more efficiently than Trudeau.

In a way, he's pandering to the Establishment.

Meanwhile, NDP leader Jagmeet Singh seems focussed on winning the support of public sector union bosses, who are basically part of the Establishment.

Even Green Party leader Elizabeth May, who by all rights should be anti-establishment, seems unwilling to openly challenge the status quo.

As a matter of fact, she recently hinted that, if it meant she could keep the Conservatives out of power, she'd be willing to prop up the pro-Establishment Liberal party in a minority government.

Perhaps the Conservatives, NDP and Greens are simply too afraid to risk the wrath of the Establishment, or maybe they think Canada has a pro-Establishment culture.

Indeed, the only federal party that is openly taking on the Establishment in this country is the fledgling People's Party, led by Maxime Bernier.  But this party's lack of a base, its lack of resources and its overall low-profile, means it doesn't have much of a voice.

So what does this all mean?

Well, it means that no matter which federal party ends up coming out on top in the next election, the real winner will likely be the Establishment.

The views, opinions and positions expressed by columnists and contributors are the author’s alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of our publication.