LP_468x60
ontario news watch
on-the-record-468x60-white
and-another-thing-468x60

The weird thing is that the threat of climate change is dire enough that it doesn't need to be exaggerated.  But that's exactly what the left is doing.

"The whole premise of the Green New Deal is that we're screwed on climate," says Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez.  "What's the point of going to school if I won't have a future?" asks 11-year-old climate striker Sophia Mathur of Sudbury, Ontario.  Corporations who won't do anything to stop climate change are doing so because they desire a Masque Of The Red Death scenario where the planet is purged of undesirables, mutter a host of continuously self-beclowning left-wing Canadian podcasters.

Climate change is happening, and it's going to keep on happening, and the effects are going to be pretty terrible, and there are going to need to be changes.  This is clear.  Is the world going to end?  Are we going to go through a MaddAddam Trilogy scenario?  PROBABLY NOT.

Maybe it was too much to expect that we could have a reasoned debate on climate change when every other political Hot Topic has devolved into a mostly pointless shouting match.  And the right has obviously engaged in full on climate denialism for years.  But as always: the left claims to hold a level of moral authority on this issue.  It's why Catherine McKenna makes those execrable and awkward Twitter videos.  It's why downtown Torontonians are so insufferably smug about public transit and cycling.  It is, up to a point, why Trudeau tossed Jody Wilson-Raybould and Jane Philpott overboard- because after all, isn't Lavscam just a big and pointless distraction from the Liberal token efforts to "put a price on pollution"?  Well, Andrew Cohen thinks so, anyway.

And, despite a few bumps in the road, this authoritarian and disingenuous strategy was working out pretty well for the Liberals.  Thanks to a good deal of bumbling and the outright racism and conspirazoid thinking of their own loudest and dumbest members, the Yellow Vests were successfully written off as a bunch of yahoos with absolutely no valid concerns, and the Liberals managed to ensnare Andrew Scheer in the bargain as well.  In Alberta, Jason Kenney is coating himself in crap and doing everything he can to make sure Notley gets rewarded for introducing her own carbon tax.  Doug Ford can plaster as many stickers on as many gas pumps as he wants and it'll go over as well as Oily the Splot did back in 2008.

This is all happening because the left has won the debate on climate change and for the right, it's all over but the crying and everybody knows it.  It took a few decades and a couple of Roland Emmerich movies, but here we are.  You did it, guys.  You finally got "social license" for your stupid tax that won't do a thing to stop climate change.  There was no need for you to discard the high-and-mighty pretense and engage in base scaremongering.  Except of course there was, because for the left, there is no victory unless there is total and complete domination.  You can't declare victory, because that would mean there would be one less thing to have a phony war against.

What we are seeing, as the left takes this increasingly shrill and detached-from-reality tone, is a tacit acknowledgment on their part that the overwhelming weight of evidence isn't enough.  Not when racist uncles across the country are still wondering why celebrities get to fly around the world to global warming conferences at holiday dinners.  Did they look at Faith Goldy's fulminations on illegal immigration and say, "We can do better?"  Because that's what it sounds like.  At this rate we may soon start hearing that people in the global south are LITERALLY BEING REPLACED by climate change.

I would like to take comfort in the usual conservative maxim that eventually the left will take things too far and there will be a backlash, but, as we see here, there is no such thing as "too far".  So, let us take another lesson from the sad case of the left-wingers who couldn't just take the W, and realize that when they talk of "evidence-based policy", they are only interested insofar as the evidence conforms with their own ideology.

Photo Credit: Jeff Burney, Loonie Politics

Written by Josh Lieblein

The views, opinions and positions expressed by columnists and contributors are the author’s alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of our publication.


According to many pundits and journalists, i.e. people who like to think they actually know what's going on in this crazy old world of ours, the amazing phenomenon known as "Trudeaumania" is now all but dead.

"Trudeaumania," of course, is what we called the frenzied love affair us Canadians once enjoyed with Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, a leader who was perceived not so much as a man, but as a political god, someone who transcended mundane, regular politics and who would surely lift the entire planet into a blissful state of "sunny ways" nirvana.

But now, if the polls are to be believed, that rosy, utopian-tinged perception about Trudeau has apparently all but evaporated.  (Though it still seems to exist as strong as ever in certain corners of the CBC and Toronto Star.)

What killed Trudeaumania is no mystery: it was the SNC-Lavalin scandal, a sordid affair which, among other things, put on open display Trudeau's less than god-like weaknesses as a leader his vacillation, his arrogance, his poor communication skills, his "fake feminism" and his astounding ability to take a mole hill and turn it into Mount Everest.

Although it could also be argued that Trudeaumania has, in fact, been petering out for about a year now.

The Prime Minister Trudeau's ill-fated trip to India, his fights over oil pipelines, his proposed carbon tax, have all combined to tarnish Trudeau's once idolized brand.

So I guess you could say the SNC-Lavalin affair was essentially the final nail in Trudeaumania's coffin.

At any rate, to paraphrase Shakespeare, I write this column to analyze Trudeaumania, not to praise it.

Wait… now that I think about it, forget Shakespeare, I actually do want to praise Trudeaumania.

At least, in a way.

After all, love him or hate him, you have to agree that Trudeau's undeniable charisma and affable, boyish charm managed to accomplish something rather remarkable and astonishing: it saved the Liberal Party from the very brink of political extinction.

Yes I know that sounds a little dramatic, but keep in mind that back in the party's dark days following the thrashing it took in the 2011 federal election the Liberals seemed to have little hope.

Not only was the party  reduced to an embarrassing third-party status, not only was it having trouble raising money, not only had it suffered through a string of ineffective leaders, not only was it losing votes to the NDP's vaunted "Orange Wave", but in addition to all that, it faced a determined foe in then Prime Minister Stephen Harper.

Indeed, in all their long history, the Liberals had never had to face an opponent quite like him.  Intelligent, ruthless and calculating, Harper was focussing all his power and all his skills to exploit every Liberal weakness to the fullest.

To be blunt, his goal was nothing less than to destroy the Liberal Party, to crush it into little bits of red dust.

This is why in those days pundits and journalists were saying the only way to defeat the Conservatives was to "Unite the Left,", i.e. to merge the Liberals with the NDP.

And one more electoral defeat would likely have pushed the Liberals over the edge.

In short, if it was to survive intact, the Liberal Party desperately needed a miracle.

That miracle arrived with the advent of Trudeaumania.

Indeed, when the Liberals picked him as their leader in 2013, Canadians could not help but love him; his magic last name, his rock star persona, his adorable enthusiasm for Canada, made him all but irresistible.

But he was still an untested novice when he took the reins of the Liberal Party, and rushing him into the leadership role to take on the battle-hardened Harper in the 2015 federal election was a huge gamble.

And as well all know, it paid off big time.

Why?  What explains the miracle of Trudeaumania?

Well, as it happens, in 2015 Canada was more than ready to embrace a "fun" leader, regardless of experience.

For one thing, Canadians wanted their own version of the hip Barack Obama; for another thing Harper, with his dour, boring personality, had more or less worn out his welcome, especially with the Canadian media, for another thing, the NDP had replaced as leader the popular late Jack Layton with the lackluster Thomas Mulcair.

In such an environment, Trudeaumania soared.

But hey, as they say "what goes up, must come down."

And the danger for the Liberals is that once the Trudeaumania craze truly crashes, their party might turn back into a pumpkin.

In other words, it'll be what it was before Trudeau's arrival, namely, a party that lacks vision, a party that lacks ideological consistency, a party that lacks roots outside of Canada's major urban centres and a party that's identified with scandal and with eastern-based big money capitalists.

And in this day and age, when populism of both the left and right variety is all the rage, that could be a bad look for the Liberals; really bad.

It's no coincidence, for instance, that Liberal Parties lacking the Trudeaumania magic have recently lost power in British Columbia, Ontario, New Brunswick and Quebec.

Plus, let's not forget the media will likewise miss Trudeaumania.

After all, journalists have grown addicted to writing reams of copy praising prime ministerial socks.

So in a post-Trudeaumania world, the Liberals and the media will need another miracle.

Hence, get ready for Freelandmania!

Photo Credit: Rolling Stone

The views, opinions and positions expressed by columnists and contributors are the author’s alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of our publication.