LP_468x60
ontario news watch
on-the-record-468x60-white
and-another-thing-468x60

You know, some people just can't be bothered to learn a lesson no matter how many times it's taught to them.

Fruitless griping about the CBC's bias, for example, is not going to stop the network from seemingly doing everything in its power to frustrate conservatives.  I've never understood who the CBC haters think they're talking to at the CBC, or who they think is listening to them, or if they even want to be listened to.  You have to wonder what would these people do with their lives if the CBC went away tomorrow.

Then we have the people on the left who blow their stack every time some obscenely rich person kicks the bucket.  Remember the uproar when Peter Munk croaked a few months ago?  What was the point of that, might I ask?  And yet, the same thing is going to happen when the next Canadian billionaire passes on.

Over and over, the same tired old scripts play themselves out, even when there's literally no reason for them to do so.  Like how CERTAIN politicians keep winking at extremists when there is literally no reason to do so.

Not that there ever would be a good reason to wink at extremists, mind you, but at least someone could justify it on a purely strategic basis.  If this was a country with an obvious base of anti-immigration or nationalist voters, then we could say that in the business of winning elections, this is the dirty part of the business.  Except there is none.  No strategic basis, and no identifiable group of voters that can be in any way counted on to show up.

Honestly, I just don't know what to do about this anymore.  It's been derailing Conservative campaigns ever since I've been alive.  And in between these campaigns, we are subject to endless hectoring from the people who will be running the campaigns about how if anyone does anything other than talk about the economy, they will be held personally responsible for handing the Liberals a majority, right up until the people running the campaign talk about some out of right field brainwave and the entire enterprise falls off a cliff.

Over in Quebec, Francois Legault was flirting with a majority.  He seemed like a breath of small-government fresh air in a largely statist province.  But then he had to go and start talking about how the province needed fewer immigrants without providing a lot of details about the various questions that he had to have known that position would take, and, correspondingly, his poll numbers went through the floor.  He still might win by cutting a deal with another of the left-wing parties, but there was no need for that to ever be an option.

Then we've got Doug Ford, who for some reason decided he was going to take a photo with Faith Goldy.  Because he wanted to trigger the libs?  Sure, whatever.  It's not like the libs are hard to trigger.  You didn't need to bring HER into it.  But you did, Doug.  After a campaign where you successfully, somehow, avoided having this be an issue.  After your dearly departed brother had to deal with the fallout of being photographed with a dude wearing a literal armband.  Solid job there, Doug.

Incidentally, what is the point of Faith Goldy's campaign now that she forced her way onto the stage at a debate to mostly eyerolls and side-eyes?  It certainly wasn't Laura Loomer crashing Shakespeare in the Park, I'll tell you that.  The amount of social media attention that farce generated couldn't be detected with an electron microscope.  Wasn't the point of this campaign to be OUTRAGEOUS?  To force Canadian media to give her attention?  When you're an out-and-out white nationalist that deliberately trolls for attention and people still refuse to give you the time of day, what's left?

But of course, none of these failures and false starts will keep anyone from trying to bridge the gap from the online cesspits where these people congregate to the ballot box.  What, after all, is the definition of insanity?

Photo Credit: The Hamilton Spectator

The views, opinions and positions expressed by columnists and contributors are the author’s alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of our publication.


You won't find it listed anywhere in the CBC's official "mandate," but I'm pretty sure the public broadcaster's main directive is to anger and annoy Canada's conservatives.

This would certainly explain, for instance, why CBC news has recently taken to goading Maxime Bernier, a former Conservative MP and now leader of the newly- minted libertarian-leaning People's Party of Canada.

If you haven't heard of this goading epidemic, here's a brief recap:

In a report from a few weeks ago, the CBC hinted Bernier had purposely issued tweets dissing the Liberal government's "diversity" policies so they would coincide with the anniversary of violent, right-wing, racist protests in America.

This nasty suggestion, by the way, was offered with zero proof, which makes you wonder if the "C" in CBC stands for "cheap shot."

Then, as if that wasn't bad enough, while interviewing him on her show, the CBC's Wendy Mesley belligerently badgered Bernier with a series of off-the-wall questions, apparently hoping he would break down and admit to being secretly in league with an international cabal of super-rich libertarian-populists.

Needless to say, these attacks generated something of a conservative backlash.

Bernier denounced the CBC for trying to "smear" him; Financial Post columnist Terence Corcoran suggested the attacks were just one more reason to privatize the CBC, and conservative journalist Ken Whyte tweeted, "If you want to see why the CBC's ratings continue to tank and why so many people in Canada have trouble trusting it and attribute to it a political agenda, watch the Wendy Mesley 'interview' of Bernier."

Of course, there's nothing new about such conservative hostility towards the CBC.

The fact is Canadian conservatives, by and large, have traditionally seen the CBC as an enemy.

And no wonder, the CBC basically embodies everything conservatives oppose — big government, taxpayer waste, snobby elitism — and, of course, it has always been suspected of harbouring a left-wing bias against the right.

Yet, for the most part, this aggressively anti-CBC attitude was more of a grassroots thing.

"Establishment" conservatives, by contrast, were typically more supportive of the CBC and willing to play nice with it.

Even Stephen Harper's Conservative government, which was widely viewed in the media as rabidly right wing, officially at least, supported the idea of a state-run broadcaster.

As matter of fact, when he was the Harper government's Heritage Minister, James Moore called the CBC a cultural institution, saying in 2011, "The CBC is the infrastructure around which Canadian arts and culture is built, so of course it is central and it is key."

Sort of sounds like something a Liberal might say, yes?

But here's the problem for establishment Conservatives: given how the world is becoming more polarized politically and given how politics is getting nastier and given how the CBC is becoming stridently more anti-conservative, sounding like a Liberal when it comes to the public broadcaster won't cut it anymore.

In other words, when discussing the CBC, Conservative Party leader Andrew Scheer will be under pressure from his base to talk less like James Moore and to talk more like Ezra Levant or Donald Trump.

As Andrew Lawton put it recently here on Loonie Politics, "Politicians are supposed to be amiable and roll with the punches, but they shouldn't try to play nice when being slandered.  You can't meet malice in the middle."

So yes, to show he's a tough guy, Scheer will eventually have to meet CBC malice with CPC malice.

And just to get him started, I'd suggest he get in the habit of calling the CBC "flake news."

Ok, that's pretty bad, but you get the idea.

Mind you, for Scheer to openly battle the media (especially a taxpayer-funded entity like the CBC) is risky; as the old adage goes, "Never pick a fight with anyone who buys ink by the barrel.'

But he might not have a choice; to paraphrase the Bible, Scheer's own base will want him to do unto the CBC, as the CBC would do unto them.

Photo Credit: National Post

The views, opinions and positions expressed by columnists and contributors are the author’s alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of our publication.