LP_468x60
on-the-record-468x60-white

Un-Premier Ford demonstrated that he still doesn't understand how government works when he responded to the charge that he was beholden to radical extremists by saying that Andrea Horwath was "the pot calling the kettle black".

"Distracting Doug" clearly isn't fit to lead a conservative party, because conservative leaders are supposed to get whiny and defensive when they're accused of pandering to extremists.  It just goes to show that he doesn't have a plan to share with Ontarians, because if he had shared his plans with Ontarians we certainly would have been better prepared.  Indeed, when he turned the tables on Horwath during that exchange that we missed the perfect opportunity to suddenly decide that "the pot calling the kettle black" was a racist expression!

Well, we have decided that Canadians have decided that they won't stand for it any longer!  Facts matter now more than ever, when conservatives won't stay where we put them.  Facts remain our best weapon against conservatives, ever since shaming them stopped working as well.  But like any weapon, some should be more powerful than others.  For example, the fact that some people on the left do have radical opinions should be one of the less powerful ones.

Essentially, any fact that helps us out matters more than any fact that doesn't.  You may find this a little hard to believe, but just remember that if the expression "All Lives Matter" misses the point, so does "All Facts Matter."  Also, since facts don't care about your feelings, we can't waste time caring about your feelings about our facts being the only facts that matter!

We also can't waste time grieving for the victims of the recent tragic shooting in Toronto when conservatives are using facts in a misleading way, because allowing them to use this senseless killing to further their own agenda would be an even larger tragedy.  You can tell that they are using facts in a misleading way because they are focusing on the fact that ISIS claimed responsibility for the shooting, or the fact that the killer managed to obtain a gun despite allegedly being mentally ill, instead of focusing on the myriad of statistics that are supposed to prove how strong Toronto is.

Now, if you are wondering why the "Toronto-is-the-safest-place-ever" facts matter more than the "Toronto-is-under-siege-by-incels-and-entitled-violent-white-men" facts that we told you mattered more the last time there was a mass killing in Toronto, that's because you are focusing on the misleading facts promulgated by Conservatives.  If you're wondering why, all of a sudden, people on the left seem to be taking the cops at their word when, on any other given day they would be raging against them for being racist, then you're REALLY focusing on misleading facts.

Ask yourself: Is ISIS a credible source, like the CBC or the Toronto Star?  And if conservatives had a point about this killer being radicalized, what kind of agenda would be served by conceding that point?  Would it make us more fearful and concerned about the direction our country is heading in?  Would it force us to acknowledge that Canada is less than a perfect example to the world?  What would that do to our international reputation?

We at the #Resistance think it's time to focus on building ourselves up in the eyes of the world instead of listening to those who would tear us down.  Because we live in such close proximity to America and Russia, the two largest purveyors of mistruths in the world, Canada has the potential to be global leaders in responding to conservative un-facts and selecting the type of facts that matter more than other facts.  But since these two powers are so skilled at trafficking in mistruths, we cannot respond in the sort of kid-glove manner which we approach literally every other problem we face.

That's why, if the Conservatives say it is Tuesday, we must say that it is Wednesday, no matter what the calendar might say.  Where was that calendar made, anyway, and how do we know that that calendar was properly regulated by the appropriate Canadian government department?

Written by Josh Lieblein

The views, opinions and positions expressed by columnists and contributors are the author’s alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of our publication.


It's entirely possible that the federal government could wade into the pitched fight between the new Ontario premier and Canada's largest city

When the Ontario provincial government fights city hall, no-one expects the House of Commons to join in.  Yet it's not out of the realm of possibility that all three levels of government could get involved in one testy issue.

This scenario started taking shape last week when Premier Doug Ford announced his plan to cut the number of Toronto city council seats from 47 to 25.

"I consulted with thousands of people right across the city and every person I talked to said you have to reduce the size of government," Ford said at a press conference.  "No one has ever said to me 'Doug we need more politicians.'  In fact it is the opposite.  People tell me that we have too many politicians, making it hard to get things done and making it harder to get things built."

In Ford's view, "We have 25 MPs, 25 MPPs and 25 school trustees" in Toronto, and there was no need for 47 councillors in "the most dysfunctional political arena in the country."  The Progressive Conservative government's strategy would reportedly save $25 million over four years for Toronto taxpayers.

Reducing the number of Toronto council seats isn't a new concept.  It's been suggested by organizations and individuals over the years, including Ford during his one term (2010-2014) as a city councillor.

Larger governments don't lead to more effective governments.  If anything, it makes them more ineffective.  This has been witnessed at Toronto council for decades, during multiple hours of needless discussion about minor issues, and councillors then mostly voting along informal party lines and political alliances.

Hence, Ford's initiative seemed like a wise proposal that would save tax dollars.

Many left-wing councillors and ward candidates were predictably furious at Ford's announcement.  Some claimed the move was anti-democratic, they've been campaigning since May, he had no right to do this at such a late date, and had never even discussed this idea during the campaign.  (There was also questions about the premier's motivation in eliminating elections for two regional chairs, one of which included former Ontario PC leader Patrick Brown.)

Well, the Ontario premier and legislative assembly actually have the democratic right, through the City of Toronto Act, to adjust the parameters of a municipal election.

It's true, however, that some candidates started campaigning early and Ford's announcement occurred just before the July 27 candidate registration deadline.  The timing could have been better but Ford has only been premier since June 29.  As well, the PC government has a four-year mandate to discuss and pass legislation and, like all previous governments of different political stripes, not all of it is going to be related to campaign promises.

This was of little conciliation to Toronto Mayor John Tory.  While he's not opposed to reducing council seats, he felt this was being done far too late in the game and without proper consultation.  He hasn't ruled out a legal challenge.

And there could be one more actor in this political play: Ottawa.

Liberal MP Adam Vaughan, a former Toronto city councillor, told the media that Ford's proposal was "reckless" and "irresponsible."  He feels the premier "doesn't like Toronto," is "breaking" the city, and the feds can't "stand idly by and let this happen."

What did Vaughan mean by this?

"We may not be able to change the electoral map," he said, but if Ottawa has to "work around Queen's Park, we will work around Queen's Park.  Because at the end of the day Torontonians are Canadians too, and the Canadian government has a responsibility to protect Canadians, especially when people are taking such vindictive and destructive actions towards them."

That's a thinly-veiled warning, no matter how you slice it.  Especially considering Ottawa has reserve power under the Constitution, which it's rarely used, but may be toying with in this instance.

Troy Media columnist and political commentator Michael Taube is also a Washington Times contributor, Canadian Jewish News columnist, and radio and TV pundit.  He was also a speechwriter for former Prime Minister Stephen Harper.

The views, opinions and positions expressed by columnists and contributors are the author’s alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of our publication.