LP_468x60
ontario news watch
on-the-record-468x60-white
and-another-thing-468x60

Premier Kathleen Wynne's Liberals are finished. NDP Leader Andrea Horwath proposes a host of nightmarish left-wing changes

With two days to go in the Ontario election, there's only one certainty for election night and that's uncertainty.

Most political analysts, pundits and columnists believe Premier Kathleen Wynne and the Liberals will be defeated on June 7.  The question is by how much.  Some believe they'll be crushed and others think Wynne's decision to concede the election a last-ditch attempt to save party status might protect a few seats.

There's also a possibility that Mike Schreiner, leader of the Green Party of Ontario, could win his seat in Guelph, while Trillium Party MPP Jack MacLaren holds on to his Carleton-Mississippi Mills riding. The former is more likely than the latter.  Whether both win, one wins or neither wins will be determined shortly.

The biggest remaining wild card is whether Doug Ford and the Progressive Conservatives, or Andrea Horwath and the New Democrats form the next government.

The polls have been all over the map.  Both parties have had large leads, small leads and been in a dead heat in popular support.  Current polls have the PCs with a 38-37 lead in Forum (June 2) and Pollara (June 3), while EKOS shows a 38.6-34.9 edge (May 31). The NDP lead 37-33 with Abacus (June 2) and 37.1-36.1 with CBC (June 3).

Who's ahead right now?  Your guess is as good as mine.

In terms of potential seat projections, which most polling firms have stopped doing, the CBC suggests the PCs will win 69 out of 124 seats, the NDP 32 and the Liberals three.  This means 20 seats are in the range of too close to call.  The probability of a PC majority is at a whopping 79.3 per cent.

As CBC poll analyst Éric Grenier wrote on June 3, "Andrea Horwath's NDP has a narrow lead over Doug Ford's PCs, but despite the close race in the popular vote the PCs have a better regional distribution of that vote and so are favoured to win more seats."

This is unusual territory for a Canadian election.

The party leading in popular support tends to win the most seats in a first-past-the-post electoral system.  That's not always the case, as evidenced in some federal elections: 1926 (Tories won the popular vote but lost the seat count to the Liberals), 1957 (Liberals won the popular vote but lost the seat count to the Tories) and 1979 (same as 1957 result).  Several provinces, including Saskatchewan (1986, 1999), B.C. (1996), Quebec (1998) and New Brunswick (2006) have experienced this split, too.

Ontario could join the list this week.

Who's the best choice to form the next government?

The NDP would be a nightmarish left-wing replacement for the already left-wing Liberals.  Horwath wants to spend $1.2 billion on a universal pharmacare.  She's proposed a child care plan that would surely cost a pretty penny.  She wants to increase corporate taxes on businesses and hike personal income taxes for high earners.  She's also refused to support back-to-work legislation for public employees such as teachers.

Meanwhile, she has candidates who aren't fit enough to go to the washroom without raising their hands, let alone hold elected office.  Some have spoken out against poppies, veterans, the second amendment and holding down regular work, while one candidate may (or may not) have sent out a Hitler meme on social media.

Hence, the better choice would be the PCs.

Yes, they've had a few pitfalls during the campaign, including the 407 ETR data breach, the long wait for a fiscal plan and controversial candidate statements.  Nevertheless, Ford is, by far, the best choice to reduce government, decrease taxes, fix the Hydro One mess, support more free enterprise and transit funding, and open up the province for business again.

That's why I voted for Ford to become Ontario's next premier.  Will others follow suit?  Stay tuned.

Troy Media columnist and political commentator Michael Taube is also a Washington Times contributor, Canadian Jewish News columnist, and radio and TV pundit.  He was also a speechwriter for former Prime Minister Stephen Harper.

The views, opinions and positions expressed by columnists and contributors are the author’s alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of our publication.


 

Neither the Toronto Star nor Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne can figure out why voters dislike Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne.  The Star says she does not deserve the disdain of voters, who have consistently made her the most unpopular premier in Canada and have forced her to admit that she cannot continue as Liberal leader.  "Wynne's reward for all this?  A big slap in the face from voters," sniffed the Star after rattling off a list of her accomplishments, including pension reform (cancelled), pharmacare (incomplete), childcare (announced only), and infrastructure (poorly implemented).

Wynne herself has acknowledged her likability deficit, in a way that shows she has zero understanding of what's behind it.  Reactions to her now-infamous "sorry not sorry" ad, many using permutations of the word "smug," have left her at a complete loss.  "It's hard to answer questions day after day about why people don't like you," she told Vice Canada.  "That's not a comfortable thing, so I don't know where the idea of smugness comes in."

Why don't people like her?  Well, if you believe commentator John Barber, also in the Star, "She failed because she was too ambitious, she failed because she never resorted to easy deceptions.  She failed because she's a woman, and because she's gay.  She failed because she's Ontarian, at the mercy of Ontarians, and we're as ugly as anyone."

Indeed, there are plenty of voters who recoil at an activist government.  And let's not be so bold as to assume there are no voters who have a deep-seated problem with a woman and/or homosexual at the helm.  But a laser focus on Wynne's sex and/or sexuality is a defense mechanism employed by those who find the real problems too difficult to discuss, or can't be bothered to find them at all.  However many sexists and homophobes are on the voter rolls, there are many more who would happily vote for an activist-minded lesbian if they supported her agenda, or viewed her as trustworthy, or, yes, liked her.

Policy disagreements are inevitable, so let's focus on the latter two conditions.  As a former cabinet minister to Premier Dalton McGuinty, Wynne is largely viewed as a continuation of the government that gave us eHealthORNGE, and the gas plant cancellations.  Under her premiership, we got Benjamin Levinbribery accusations, and highly questionable payments to teachers' unions.  Few parties can survive that many high-profile scandals, least of all parties that have been in power for five successive terms.  Any successor to McGuinty would have been saddled with this image, especially one who came from his cabinet, as Wynne and six of her current ministers did.  The Liberals needed a housecleaning, and none of the ex-ministers running for leadership in 2013 were lemony fresh.

But even if Wynne herself had been ethically spotless, the hardest stain of all to remove has been her attitude toward the electorate.  If McGuinty was Premier Dad, Wynne is Premier Middle School Assistant Principal Who Needs Your Parents to Sign This Letter and Return It to Her.  When contending with negative reactions to her efforts, she consistently demonstrates that she views voters as children who need a good smack upside the head.  Do you share the Auditor General's concerns about the true state of provincial finances?  Too bad.  Want to know how the teachers' unions spent your $2.5 million?  Don't worry about it.  Not saving enough for retirement?  The government will save for you, whether you like it or not.  Want to buy beer at the corner store?  You can't handle it.  Don't ask why, you just can't.  Worried about hydro bills?  Well, okay, maybe they could have done something differently.  What kind of something?  Do a better job selling the policies that made your bills go up.

In this way, if in no other, Wynne truly is the opposite of Progressive Conservative leader Doug Ford.  Where he capitulates to public opinion too fast, she ignores it until the last minute.  Where he is driven to win elections, she is driven to push agendas.  Neither has proven to find a balance.  But voters have five years of experience with Wynne as premier, with not much to show for it except higher hydro bills.  As she may finally have realized, nothing matters more to an everyday citizen than what's on their own kitchen table.

That may be the one regret she'll admit publicly.  She should regret thinking she could exhibit such evident, potent disdain for the public and emerge from public service unscathed.

Photo Credit: Jeff Burney, Loonie Politics

Written by Jess Morgan

The views, opinions and positions expressed by columnists and contributors are the author’s alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of our publication.