LP_468x60
on-the-record-468x60-white

It's possible to favour conservative ideas without being depicted as bigoted, racist, intolerant, elitist and out-of-touch with reality

There's long been a sense (or, in some camps, understanding) that the progressive movement suffers from continual bouts of smugness.

Liberals have often dismissed this criticism as something akin to conservative kvetching.  Nevertheless, they were forced to look in the proverbial mirror once more in, of all places, one of America's foremost liberal publications.

Gerard Alexander, a right-leaning political science professor at the University of Virginia, wrote an intriguing New York Times op-ed on May 13 entitled Liberals, You're Not as Smart as You Think.  While his piece was certainly firm, it was written in a congenial, matter-of-fact manner that could force many progressives to do some seriously soul searching.

Consider his opening two paragraphs:

"I know many liberals, and two of them really are my best friends.  Liberals make good movies and television shows.  Their idealism has been an inspiration for me and many others.  Many liberals are very smart.  But they are not as smart, or as persuasive, as they think.

"And a backlash against liberals a backlash that most liberals don't seem to realize they're causing is going to get President Trump re-elected."

How so?

You have to dig deeper into the liberal mindset.

This ideological group has a near-vice grip in specific areas, including higher education, media and Hollywood.  It has helped create several powerful soapboxes from which to preach their message.  Yet it's also made liberals "feel more powerful than they are" since they "often don't realize how provocative or inflammatory they can be.  In exercising their power, they regularly not only persuade and attract but also annoy and repel."

Hence, the typical language and tactics of liberals is working against them.

Donald Trump is an example of this.  Liberals have used every smug, self-righteous excuse in the book to explain his rise to power, from supposed Russian election meddling to racism and bigotry against Barack Obama, the first black U.S. president.  Even the defeated 2016 Democratic presidential candidate, Hillary Clinton, suggested her gender was a factor.

But it would be wise if liberals could "act as if they're not so certain and maybe actually not be so certain," Alexander wrote, "that bigotry motivates people who disagree with them on issues like immigration."  Moreover, "without sacrificing their principles, liberals can come across as more respectful of others.  Self-righteousness is rarely attractive, and even more rarely rewarded."

Think about it.  People don't want to lectured to when it comes to supporting and/or rejecting policies.  It's possible to favour ideas like small government, low taxes, traditional marriage, capital punishment, a border wall, military funding, policing and the war on terror without being depicted as bigoted, racist, intolerant, elitist and out-of-touch with reality.

When liberals paint the nearly 63 million Americans who voted for Trump with the same brushstroke, it doesn't help enhance their political message.  If anything, it emboldens conservatives, right-leaning independents and radical centrists to support the president in his re-election bid.  That's why his poll numbers have gone up recently.

Canada is experiencing something similar.

Liberals are trying to paint right-leaning provincial politicians like Ontario's Doug Ford and Alberta's Jason Kenney as either intolerant, out-of-touch or Trump-like.  Many average voters, however, see through this farcical strategy and understand their reasonable and logical political messages loud and clear.

Heck, the liberals are even turning off the NDP in Ontario as of late with a father-knows-best/mother-knows-best attitude.  It may be a form of posturing to save their political hides before next month's election, but social democrats dislike smugness just as much as conservatives do.

Will American and Canadian liberals wake up to reality and start to change their political tactics before it's too late?

The answer is painfully obvious but there's no point in being smug about it.

Troy Media columnist and political commentator Michael Taube is also a Washington Times contributor, Canadian Jewish News columnist, and radio and TV pundit.  He was also a speechwriter for former Prime Minister Stephen Harper.

The views, opinions and positions expressed by columnists and contributors are the author’s alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of our publication.


"There is an alarm going off in this province."

That's what Doug Ford said yesterday, talking about the state of the Ontario economy.

But the real alarm is going off at the PC headquarters.

Their campaign is now on shaky ground and their supposedly insurmountable lead is now down to a meagre 5 points.  The Liberals are fading fast, now in third place as Andrea Horwath's NDP is gaining momentum.  The PCs now realize that this campaign, which was theirs to lose, might very well be lost already.

Meanwhile, if the Liberals knew that they were likely going to lose this election, they now risk not only being overtaken by the NDP, but could even be obliterated.  Electoral forecaster Bryan Breguet, whose Too close to call website aggregates polls to run simulations, now says that the worst case scenario would leave the OLP with zero seats.  Panic is setting in Wynne's HQ.

Nothing surprising, then, in seeing both Liberals and Progressive Conservatives turn their guns on the NDP, a party they ignored at their own peril until now.

Hilariously, the Liberal Party attacked the NDP's platform, stating that the numbers didn't add up.  This is coming from the Liberals, currently in government and constantly denounced by Ontario's Auditor General for their creative accounting practices.  Meanwhile, the NDP platform was reviewed and validated by former Parliamentary Budget Officer Kevin Page.  No wonder the Liberal attack fell flat.

On the Tory campaign trail, Doug Ford is now raising the spectre of Bob Rae every chance he gets: "Everyone remembers the dreaded NDP years, destroyed the province, raised taxes, literally destroyed the economy.  We don't want that to happen again."   Thankfully for Andrea Horwath, it turns out that Bob Rae was actually a Liberal.

More is coming, though.  The NDP campaign will now be under constant, sustained attacks while being subjected to more intense scrutiny by the media.  It doesn't take much to send a campaign into a tailspin.  The more shots you take, the more chances one of them will hit the sweet spot.  Mud will fly.  Horwath needs to avoid as much flak as she possibly can while hoping that her NDP candidates will be disciplined and stay on message.  If that happens, the wind will stay in the NDP's sails.

Photo Credit: National Post

The views, opinions and positions expressed by columnists and contributors are the author’s alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of our publication.